Argumentation: The Art of Civil Advocacy teaches students the principles of argumentation as a practical way to engage in interpersonal and public deliberation. Authors Larry Underberg and Heather Norton offer a unique approach for creating civil discourse by encouraging students to consider how they argue with others to enhance or diminish opportunities for future dialogue. A variety of everyday examples are provided in the text to demonstrate how well-reasoned argumentation can strengthen communities and create productive citizenship. Students gain a better understanding for the situations, environments, and relationships that form the context for an advocate, and how those factors can influence discourse. Instructors, sign in at study.sagepub.com/Underberg for test banks, PowerPoint® slides, and more!
Throughout this text, author Christopher W. Tindale identifies how argumentation as a communicative practice can best be understood by its rhetorical features.
Encouraging self-reflection, this book empowers students to find their voice and create positive change through argumentation in everyday life.
The New Rhetoric is founded on the idea that since “argumentation aims at securing the adherence of those to whom it is addressed, it is, in its entirety, relative to the audience to be influenced,” says Chaïm Perelman and L. Olbrechts ...
This book uses different perspectives on argumentation to show how we create arguments, test them, attack and defend them, and deploy them effectively to justify beliefs and influence others.
John T. Cacioppo , Steven G. Harkins , and Richard E. Petty , " The Nature of Attitudes and Cognitive Response and their Relationships to Behavior , " in Petty , Ostrom , & Brock , ( Eds . ) , pp . 31-54 .
Berger, C. R., and J. J. Bradac, 1982. Language and Social Knowledge. Arnold. Berger, C. R., and R. Calabrese. 1975. “Some Explorations in Initial Interaction and Beyond: Toward a Developmental Theory of Interpersonal Communication.
FIGURE 1.1 Rationale Argument Map of the Video Games Example Dr. Smith is an expert support in a field on a ... to classify the argument as an instance of the argumentation scheme for argument from expert opinion by enabling the user to ...
The advantages of seeing the role of the auxiliary experts as testifying to a source's epistemic character rather than being ... as modelled on Scheme 1, turn out to be patterns of independent convergent support rather than a pattern of ...
Retrieved September 18, 2007 at http://news.vahoo.com/s/ ap/ 200709 1 8/ap_on_he_me/elderlv_suicide Zarefsky, David. Public speaking: Strategies for success, 4th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2005. Ziegelmueller, George W., Jack Kay, ...
This book is the edition of the Proceedings of the International Colloquium “Rhetoric and Argumentation in the Beginning of the XXIst Century” which was held at the Faculty of Letters of the University of Coimbra, in October 2-4, 2008, ...