This ground-breaking book takes a fresh look at potential non-litigation solutions to providing personal injury compensation. It is the first systematic comparative study of such a large number – over forty – of personal injury compensation schemes. It covers the drivers for their creation, the frameworks under which they operate, the criteria and thresholds used, the compensation offered, the claims process, statistics on throughput and costs, and analysis of financial costings. It also considers and compares the successes and failings of these schemes. Many different types of redress providers are studied. These include the comprehensive no-blame coverage offered by the New Zealand Accident Compensation Corporation; the widely used Patient, Pharmaceutical, Motor Accident and Workers Compensation Insurance systems of the Nordic states; the far smaller issue-focused schemes like the UK Thalidomide and vCJD Trusts; vaccine damage schemes that exist in many countries; as well as motor vehicle schemes from the USA. Conclusions are drawn about the functions, essential requirements, architecture, scope, operation and performance of personal injury compensation systems. The relationships between such schemes, the courts and regulators are also discussed, and both calls and need for reforms are noted. Noting the wide calls for reform of NHS medical negligence litigation within the UK, and its replacement with a no blame approach, the authors' findings outline options for future policy in this area. This major contribution builds on general shifts from courts to ADR, and from blame to no blame in regulation, and is a work that has the potential to have a major impact on the field of personal injury redress. With contributions by Raymond Byrne, Claire Bright, Shuna Mason, Magdalena Tulibacka, Matti Urho, Mary Walker and Herbert Woopen.
This ground-breaking book takes a fresh look at potential non-litigation solutions to providing personal injury compensation.
1 For example, Royal Commission on Civil Liability and Compensation for Personal Injury: Report (Pearson Report) (London, HMSO, 1978) and its earlier counterparts; Compensation for Personal Injury in New Zealand: Report of the Royal ...
... Redress Schemes for Personal Injuries (2017)) No-fault compensation schemes have been surprisingly prevalent in providing redress for personal injuries, where they have been used ... Compensation Schemes for Personal Injuries I. Introduction.
This important new work provides a comprehensive, logical, and structured approach to understanding the statutory framework governing both no-fault and common law entitlements under the key personal injuries compensation schemes in Victoria ...
The seventh edition of this classic work explores recent momentous changes in personal injury law and practice and puts them into broad perspective.
Personal Injury Compensation demonstrates how the liability and compensation systems of six European countries work in practice. It shows the extent to which victims of a number of different accident...
These are not necessarily novel approaches - classic tort law already offers remedies for such losses. Sometimes these traditional solutions are enhanced or replaced by alternative redress schemes.
136 The Personal Injury Discount Rate: How it should be set in the future (Ministry of Justice, ... (CEDR) and Trust Mediation Limited to mediate disputes arising from personal injury and clinical negligence incidents and claims.
95 M Galanter, 'Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (And Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society' (1983) 31 UCLA Law Review 4, 19; HM Kritzer, Risks, Reputations and Rewards: ...
7-75 on Personal injury and Death - jurisdiction & applicable law in personal injury and fatal accident cases - information on the debate on harmonisation Authors This book is the product of a comparative research project conducted by the ...