This book about the complicated meaning of left and right in politics carries the optimistic message that rational truth seeking can lead people towards the center and away from extreme positions. There is of course a major argument to the contrary, which is that political activities are very substantially determined by narrow interests, vague intuitions and strong emotions. Although rationality has indeed been diluted in contemporary politics, it is likely that much remains below the surface. Accordingly, there still might be time for therapeutic interventions aimed at nudging millions of minds towards a balanced political center. The book intervenes in a disarming and calming way. Throughout the 32 short chapters, a wide variety of politically-loaded thoughts are attributed to a pair of cartoon dogs. Left-dog and right-dog are duly introduced in the first chapter, where readers will immediately see that they are friendly and not fighting. Indeed, there is no such thing as dog-eat-dog in the community of truth-seekers. There are a few diagrams in each chapter that readers (or their students or children) are invited to color-in to represent the two political sides. Each chapter sets out some distinctive divide-bridging insights into basic issues such as truth, ethics, passions, hopes, intentions, genders, orientations, abortions, boundaries, identities, language, leaders, inequalities and ecologies to mention just a few. Any one of the 32 chapters can be contemplated in private, discussed between family members or taught as a stand-alone exercise. Prudently selected chapters would fit with ease into just about every course in business schools, but also in college level courses across the entire spectrum of the social sciences, including philosophy. This might seem like a ludicrously-hyped marketing claim for any serious book, but readers are urged to try it out for themselves and their relatives, colleagues or students and see what happens.
Party Influence in Congress challenges current arguments and evidence about the influence of political parties in the U.S. Congress. Steven S. Smith argues that theory must reflect policy, electoral, and collective party goals.
When a very ambitious young Democratic judge in Alabama , George Wallace , ran as a moderate for governor in 1958 , he spurned support from the Ku Klux Klan and was endorsed by the NAACP . He lost to a candidate who ran a very ugly ...
The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future
Haughey insisted on an open roll - call vote and won by fiftyeight to twenty - two , but two ministers , Desmond O'Malley and Martin O'Donoghue , left the government rather than vote for him , and his opponents clair.ed that they and ...
Tweed, Sweeny, and Hall, now alarmed by the disclosuresinthe Times, decided to make Connolly the scapegoat, and asked the aldermen and supervisors to appoint a committee to examine his accounts. By the timethecommittee appearedfor ...
22. The Washington Post , September 13 , 1978. The comment was made by Senator Wendell R. Anderson ( D. , Minn . ) to columnist David S. Broder . 23. The Washington Post , September 13 , 1978 . 24. Arthur H. Miller , “ Rejoinder to ...
Political Parties
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT delivers a unique "perspectives" format within a traditional topic sequence.
University of Vermont Professor Sam Hand termed the book "the best short introduction to Vermont politics available." The book has been adopted by many schools & colleges.
国家社科基金项目“西方党政关系研究”中期成果