"The just war theory is a doctrine, which is related to and at times interchangeable with such concepts as military tradition, military ethics, the doctrines of military leaders, conflict theology, ethical policy-making, and military tactics and strategy. The purpose of the just war doctrine is to attempt to guarantee that a war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just. The criteria are split into two groups: "right to go to war" (jus ad bellum) and "right conduct in war" (jus in bello). The first concerns the morality of going to war, and the second the moral conduct within war. Recently there have been calls for the inclusion of a third category of just war theory known as jus post bellum that is concerned with the morality of post-war settlement and reconstruction. Just war theory postulates that war, while terrible, is made less so with the right conduct. It also assumes that war is not always the worst option. Important responsibilities, undesirable outcomes, or preventable atrocities may justify war. There is a just war tradition, a historical body of rules or agreements that have applied in various wars across the ages. The just war tradition consists primarily of the writings of various philosophers and legal experts through history. This tradition examines both their philosophical visions of war's ethical limits and whether their thoughts have contributed to the body of conventions that have evolved to guide war and warfare"--
Russian Roulette : The Superpower Game , Arthur Macy Cox , Times Books , 1982 . The Tax Dilemma : Praying for Peace , Paying for War , Donald D. Kaufman , Herald Press , 1978 . Toward A Dependable Peace : A Proposal for an Appropriate ...
President George W. Bush, Second Inaugural Address What has come to be known as the "Bush Doctrine" is an idealistic approach to international relations that imagines a world transformed by the promise of democracy and that sees ...
This book addresses five broad issues: UN Security Council authorization, self-defence against terrorism, pre-emptive war, humanitarian and pro-democratic intervention, and the protection of civilians and combatants during armed conflict.
As we prayerfully shared Jesus' gospel of nonviolent agape, it became clear that, although we had very different church backgrounds, we had been led to the same conclusion: the Messiah of the world is nonviolent and his Sermon on the ...
This book examines the moral choices faced by U.S. political and military leaders in deciding when and how to employ force, from the American Revolution to the present day.
La 4e de couv. indique : "La guerre peut-elle être juste ?
Practical Pacifism argues for an approach to peace that aims toward a moral consensus that is developed pragmatically through dialogue aimed at overlapping consensus.
Le retour des doctrines de la "guerre juste" dans les discours des grandes puissances pourrait suffire à en condamner le concept : ces doctrines ne servent-elles pas à justifier leurs entreprises impérialistes ?
Le dilemme du soldat: guerre juste et prohibition du meurtre
And, if so, for what purpose? In this book, Richard J. Regan confronts these controversial questions by first considering the basic principles of just-war theory and then applying those principles to historical and ongoing conflicts.