Tort doctrine is complex and nuanced on its own; a torts casebook that mystifies first year students will not help them develop the core skill of legal analysis. Tort Law in Focus presents concepts in a way that students can understand and apply. Rather than hide the ball, Geoffrey Rapp explains new terms clearly, and guides students in the specific techniques of applying tort law to practice-based problems. Along with concrete examples, Tort Law in Focus provides clear and thorough introductions to those areas of tort law (such as proximate cause under the dominant and new Restatement approaches; res ipsa; factual cause, including but-for cause and alternatives in special cases like indivisible injuries and alternative causes; the duty of owners and occupiers of land; and comparative negligence) that are especially challenging for first-year law students. Professors and Students Will Benefit From: Clear introductions and transitional text that frame key rules, concepts, and cases A wide selection of modern, high-interest cases that apply dominant legal rules, and which, where possible, interpret and apply the Restatement (Third) Summaries and discussion of canonical cases that convey the history and context of modern tort law Examples, flow charts and maps that illustrate concepts, rules, and the relationships among parties and interests Consistent use of problems that encourage students to implement “IRAC” (or equivalent) strategies for structuring their analysis Samples of documents commonly used in tort law practice, such as demand letters and complaints
4 See, e.g., J. Stapleton, 'Tort, Insurance and Ideology' (1995) 58(6) MLR 820, R. Merkin, 'Tort, Insurance and Ideology: Further Thoughts' (2012) 75(3) MLR 301, ... 26 Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613 at 626 per Lord Keith.
Hallmark features: Incredibly versatile, this text has been successfully adopted at a wide range of schools and can be taught from any intellectual or political perspective.
The text minimizes the procedural complexities of cases that have already been decided. • Fifty-Six Discussion Problems. The main instructional feature of Advanced Tort Law: A Problem Approach is the fifty-six discussion problems.
This edition incorporates recent case law and legislative changes and includes updated guided answers to many problem questions.
562 Ward v CC of West Midlands Police (1997) Times, 13 December ... 612 Ward v Hertfordshire CC [1970] 1 All ER 535 . . . .218 Ward v London CC [1938] 2 All ER 341 ... 121 Ward v Macauley (1791) 4 Term Rep 489 ... 276 Ward v Tesco ...
Rustad, Michael (1992), 'In Defense of Punitive Damages in Products Liability', Iowa Law Review, 78, 1–88. Sage, William M. (1988), 'Drug Product Liability and Health Care Delivery Systems', Stanford Law Review, 40, 989–1026.
Bringing new institutional, feminist, & critical perspectives on the torts systems to this thorough revision of his successful reader, renowned torts scholar Robert Rabin gives your students interesting insight into...
Tort Law Concentrate is written and designed to help you succeed.
Sweeney , 170 Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School v . Perotti , 106-7 National Dairy Products Corp. v . Durham , 241n National Steel Service Center , Inc. v . Gibbons , 117 Nebraska Innkeepers , Inc. v .
The Language of Common Law Made Simple: Focus on Legal Studies: Contract Law, Tort Law