The implications for law of new neuroscientific techniques and findings are now among the hottest topics in legal, academic, and media venues. Law and Neuroscience—a collaboration of professors in law, neuroscience, and biology—is the first and still only coursebook to chart this new territory, providing the world’s most comprehensive collection of neurolaw materials. This text will be of interest to many professors teaching Criminal Law and Torts courses, who would like to incorporate the most current thinking on how biology intersects with the law. New to the Second Edition: Extensively revised chapters, updated with new findings and materials. New chapter on Aging Brains Hundreds of new references and citations to recent developments. Over 600 new references and citations to recent developments, with 260 new readings, including 27 new case selections Highly current material; 45% of cases and publications in the Second Edition were published since the first edition in 2014 Professors and students will benefit from: Technical subjects explained in an accessible manner Extensive glossary of key terms Photos and illustrations enliven the text Professors of any background can teach this course
Roskies , Adina L. , “Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance, ” 1 Neuroethics 19 ( 2008 ). Rubinstein , Ariel , “Comment on Neuroeconomics, ” 24 Econ. & Phil . 485 ( 2008 ). Ryle , Gilbert , The Concept of ...
Although there was a substantial range of opinion among Project participants about the potential relevance of neuroscience to criminal law, it became apparent that a basic primer or handbook that set forth a statement of the relation as the ...
This book studies the various interactions between neuroscience and the world of law, and explores how neuroscientific findings could affect some fundamental legal categories and how the law should be implemented in such cases.
Bringing together the latest work from leading scholars in this emerging and vibrant subfield of law, this book examines the philosophical issues that inform the intersection between law and neuroscience.
Alces draws on neuroscience to explore the internal contradictions of legal doctrines, and consider what would be involved in constructing novel legal regimes based on emerging understandings of human capacities and characteristics not only ...
Does neuroscience show that all our ideas about law and ethics are false? David Opderbeck answers this question with a broad and deep survey of the relationship between theology, science, and ethics.
Adopting a broadly compatibilist approach, this volume's authors argue that the behavioral and mind sciences do not threaten the moral foundations of legal responsibility.
This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right.
Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C) by Emslie, H., Wilson, F. C., Burden, V., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Wilson, B.A. (2003). Child Neuropsychology, 13(6), 539–542. doi:10.1080/09297040601112781. Barrett ...
This edited book provides an in-depth examination of the implications of neuroscience for the criminal justice system.