What is our goal: equal opportunity or equality of result? The debate rages on.
The November 5, 1996 decision by voters in California to eliminate most forms of state sanctioned affirmative action ignited a civil rights debate that sent shock waves across the country. The vote had critics celebrating the dawn of a new era of equal rights, while opponents warned of school and workplace discrimination without the protective blanket of affirmative action.
The question of racial equality has inspired new debate today, reminiscent of the conflicts of the 1960s. Again we ask ourselves: Is affirmative action necessary to maintain equal labor practices, school desegregation plans, and broad social standards of racial equality? Does affirmative action or laws to roll it back go against the idea of equality itself? Should race play an important role in college admissions and corporate hiring? Is affirmative action a poison instead of a cure? For some, it depends on how the term is defined.
These and other questions are debated in this highly charged collection of essays by a distinguished group of politicians, philosophers, educators, and others including Tom Beauchamp, Ward Connerly, Ronald Dworkin, Stanley Fish, Lyndon Johnson, Nicholas LeMann, Louis Pojman, George Sher, Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Judith Jarvis Thomson, Richard Wasserstrom, Cornell West, and Steven Yates. Included also are important legal decisions bearing on affirmative action.
Ferguson . See Mark Elliott , Color - Blind Justice : Albion Tourgée and the Quest for Racial Equality from the Civil War to Plessy v . Ferguson ( 2006 ) ; Otto Olsen , Carpetbagger's Crusade : The Life of Albion Winegar Tourgée ( 1965 ) ...
Discussions of the controversy reflect little understanding of the role of race in college admissions, ignore the fact that eligibility does not guarantee admission, and falsely cast affirmative action as a policy based on race alone.
In this "penetrating new analysis" (New York Times Book Review) Ira Katznelson fundamentally recasts our understanding of twentieth-century American history and demonstrates that all the key programs passed during the New Deal and Fair Deal ...
Supporters believe that affirmative action policies are necessary to counter the lingering effects of slavery and segregation in schools and on the job. Critics insist that the programs are ineffective...
Catalyst , Cracking the Glass Ceiling ; Morrison , The New Leaders . 38. ... Hewstone and Brown , “ Contact Is Not Enough . ... Buono and Kamm , “ Marginality " ; Collins , “ Black Executives ” ; Morrison and Von Glinow , " Women and ...
Distinguished contributors to this volume discuss the policy from a level of definition to actual case studies and further, to the theoretical examination of the justice of affirmative action.
Some advocates of affirmative action argue that the policy remains necessary in order to make the U.S. workforce more diverse.
This important volume shares information documented for the Fisher case and provides empirical evidence to help inform scholarly conversation and institutions’ decisions regarding race-conscious practices in higher education.
Evidence from California and Texas.” Industrial é' Labor Relations Review 58 (200 5): 41 6. Chavez, Lydia. The Color Bind: California's Battle to EndAfl'irmative Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998. Citrin, Jack.
Clear-headed, well-reasoned, and persuasive, this book will be read eagerly by everyone from students to legislators, by anyone concerned with racial justice in America.