Meiklejohn, Alexander. Free Speech and Its Relation to Self Government. New York: Harper Brothers Publishers, [1948]. xiv, 107pp. Reprinted 2001 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. LCCN 99-87204. ISBN 1-58477-087-2. Cloth. $80. * "Dr. Meiklejohn [1872-1964], in a book which greatly needed writing, has thought through anew the foundations and structure of our theory of free speech...he rejects all compromise. He reexamines the fundamental principles of Justice Holmes' theory of free speech and finds it wanting because, as he views it, under the Holmes doctrine speech is not free enough. In these few pages, Holmes meets an adversary worthy of him... Meiklejohn in his own way writes a prose as piercing as Holmes, and as a foremost American philosopher, the reach of his culture is as great...this is the most dangerous assault which the Holmes position has ever borne." John P. Frank, Texas Law Review 27:405-412.
The Debate of Freedom of Speech in the House of Commons in February 1621
Blasi , Vince . " Prior Restraints on Demonstrations , " Michi - gan Law Review 68 ( August , 1970 ) , 1481-1574 . Boccarosse , Ralph N. ' ' Lloyd Corporation v . Tanner : Expression of First Amendment Rights in the Privately owned ...
Recht am Wort: Schutz des eigenen Wortes im System von Art. 28 ZGB
On Day 2 . computer expert Donna Hoffman of Vanderbilt University testified for the plaintiffs . Hoffman , who had criticized the Time article about cyberporn , believed that the Internet was different from the broadcast media because ...
The Law of Public Communication: ... Update
Smolla and Nimmer on Freedom of Speech
A cogent, objective, and in-depth exploration of the legal, political, and social complexities of the decision to ban hate speech.
This is the perfect volume for anyone - student, general reader, or scholar - looking for an accessible overview of this critical topic.
Discusses how media have "packaged" the war in Iraq [2003], exploring the way the media have presented the war by telling human interest stories, supporting public policies, and crafting a narrative that supports the war.
An examination - and rejection - of the charge that, in interpreting the First Amendment as protecting hate speech and pornography while allowing other exceptions to the free-speech principle, American courts have favoured the interests of ...