In a world confronted by conflicting moral beliefs and values, the question is often raised, "Can science help us to solve our moral problems?" Many people today believe that moral principles are derived from religion. Their critics point out that the great religions often vehemently disagree about what is good, bad, right, and wrong. On the other side of a great divide stand many who say that there are no ethical standards at all and that morality is merely a question of personal taste or cultural relativity.
This volume presents a unique collection of authors who generally maintain that science can help us make wise choices and that an increase in scientific knowledge can help modify our ethical values and bring new ethical principles into social awareness.
Among the thirty contributors to this volume are distinguished scientists and philosophers, including Arthur Caplan, Vern Bullough, Mario Bunge, Tom Flynn, Susan Haack, Richard Hull, Scott Lilienfeld, Ronald Lindsay, Thomas Szasz, Richard Taylor, and others.
Among the wide-ranging topics discussed are bio-genetic engineering, stem cell research, organ transplants, human enhancement, abortion, euthanasia, psychiatry, and psychotherapy.
Editor Paul Kurtz maintains that there is a modified form of naturalistic ethics that is directly relevant to both science and ethics and provides guidelines for our moral choices.
Growing global linkages and complexity are redressing the paradox aptly characterized by sociologist Daniel Bell in the last century , “ government is too big for the small problems of our society and too small for the big ones .
Is scientific theory really just a matter of persuasion? Do scientists merely invent rather than discover? Do scientists merely invent rather than discover? Indeed, do brute facts of nature gain meaning only within a rhetorical context?
A head of the Human Genome Project and former atheist presents a scientific argument for the existence of God, revealing how science can support faith by citing the areas of nature that can and cannot be fully explained by Darwinian ...
克勒克.馬克士威( )以科期而言相當穩定,因為他們本身存在某種劑量的波動性。險特性,同樣不同於由自治市領導,一團混亂的共和國。第二種風險特性長)大為不同。中央集權系統的風建模,並用數學式指出,緊密控制蒸汽機的速度,反而造成不穩定。斯威爾一八六七年 ...
別擔心誰知道也許最後會以喜劇收場對一個出象的結果加以塞克斯都代表並立下庇羅派懷疑主義庇羅派追求源自擱置信仰的某種科即為經驗的意義是科學並把其醫術隔絕於教條科學的問題之外其醫術進一步解釋了塞克斯都名字裡的恩披里是曼諾多圖斯融合經驗主義和 ...
當時已經以格林威治的皇家天文臺為中心。是無所不通的虎克所計畫的;當時他與雷恩爵士在大火( Great Fire )之後再建倫敦。航海者離岸很遠時,要定出自己的位置(經、緯度) ,就可以把他對星星的讀數與格林威治的讀數比較。
■ 網路革命、數位科技帶來的經濟不平等、社會人際疏離、文化沉淪、數位民主、全球壟斷、民粹統治、隱私的終結、科技性失業、數位成癮等政經社會困境,本書提供我們逃出生 ...
A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.
When software systems are delivered too late, when they fail to meet the needs of their users, when only a fraction of their capacity is used, when their maintenance costs...
Is science our most precious possession or has our culture elevated science into a false idol? Is technology a useful servant or a malign genie? These questions are at the...