Attorneys representing families and children face ethical dilemmas that are largely unaddressed by the rules of professional conduct. Where rules do address ethical issues in this context, they tend to appear as exceptions to the general rule. From the business aspects of crafting fee agreements for divorcing couples to the heart wrenching counseling dilemmas when an attorney faces family violence issues, the rules of conduct recognize that representing families and children is different than representation in many other areas. Family law attorneys serve in a variety of roles that have unique ethical demand: whether acting as a mediator, collaborator or guardian ad litem, attorneys must craft a set of standards for themselves out of a patchwork of ethics opinions, voluntary guidelines and occasional court decisions or rules. In Ethical Issues in Family Representation, Professor Barbara Glesner Fines provides an important resource to fill the regulatory gaps and resolve the ethical dilemmas. Through a combination of problems, readings, and primary source materials, the text examines the most common dilemmas of family law practice. The text is divided into seven topic areas: • Practicing Family Law — Good Ethics is Good Business (fees, unbundling & working with other paralegals) • Competency (dealing with emotion, interdisciplinary practice) • Clients and Conflicts (identifying the client, resolving common conflicts issues) • Confidentiality (client capacity, dangerous clients, the client in danger) • Special Issues in the Representation of Children (Resolving ambiguities in models of representation) • Dispute Resolution — Advocacy (litigation ethics, the special problem of the pro se litigant) • Dispute Resolution (Negotiation, Mediation and Collaborative law). An appendix contains specialized standards of practice for the field. The text is an excellent resource for family law teachers to use in their courses and clinics and for the development of specialized courses in this field. For the family law attorney, the text will make an excellent deskbook resource for answering common dilemmas.
Principles in Practice Todd L. Archibald, James Cooper Morton ... Toronto Belt Line Railway ( 1912 ) , 21 O.W.R. 348 at 350 ( Master ) ( Master Cartwright ) ; Inglis v . James Richardson & Sons Ltd. ( 1912 ) , 4 O.W.N. 23 ( Master ) ...
Designed to be used in conjunction with the Connecticut Practice Book and the Connecticut General Statutes, this exceptionally practical, how-to guide to civil litigation in Connecticut provides a unique overall picture of the litigation ...
These are raised by Kidder , but have also been discussed within CLRP and by others , including Tushnet ( 1980 ) and ... s Of course , there is always an additional risk that the presence of the researcher will alter decisions the ...
33, see Cain v Francis & McKay v Hamlani [2008] EWCA 1451.) See also paragraph 7.4.4. 7.4.6.7 Practical pointers when calculating the limitation period As stated, time 'runs' from the day following the day of accrual of the action.
Litigation privilege can normally be claimed in proceedings in which a judicial function is being exercised, but if the proceedings are merely fact-finding (for example, an inquiry under the Banking Acts—see the Three Rivers case again) ...
Civil Litigation Conference, 2000: Materials Prepared for the Continuing Legal Education Seminar, the Third Biennial Civil Litigation Conference, Held in...
Asbestos Litigation in the United Kingdom: An Interim Report
Cross-border Litigation: Environmental Rights in the Great Lakes Ecosystem
The text is ideal for students taking the Legal Practice Course or relevant LLB or LLM modules and features case studies on both a personal injury matter and a commercial matter, making it suitable for students with either a high street or ...
This review investigated the nature of sexual harassment in employment that is being reported to HREOC by analysing complaints made to HREOC.