Bringing together leading authorities, this rigorous yet reader-friendly book reviews the state of the science on a wide range of psychological issues commonly encountered in the forensic context. The goal is to help professionals and students differentiate between supported and unsupported techniques--and steer clear of those that may be misleading or legally inadmissible. With a focus on real-world legal situations, the book offers guidelines for presenting scientific evidence accurately and effectively in courtroom testimony and written reports. The volume addresses four broad areas that have seen considerable research advances in recent years: memory and suggestibility, specialized assessment instruments, forensic evaluation of psycholegal issues, and criminal sentencing. Contributors provide in-depth examinations of current controversies related to such issues as: recovered memories, projective techniques, lie detection, child witnesses, offender rehabilitation, psychopathy, and violence risk assessment. Each chapter describes the tools or practices in question, summarizes their empirical evidence base, identifies gaps in what is known, and dispels potentially hateful myths. Straightforward recommendations are given for whether and when particular techniques should be used, which uses to avoid, and factors to keep in mind when communicating findings to legal decision makers. Separating science from pseudoscience in a vitally important area, this volume will be indispensable for psychologists, psychiatrists, and other forensic and clinical professionals who may be called to serve as expert witnesses, as well as interested legal professionals. It is a highly informative text for graduate students in forensic psychology and psychiatry.
The book concludes with commentaries written by leading social science and law scholars that discuss key legal and scientific themes and illustrate how psychological science is, or can be, used in the courts and in other policy contexts.
This state-of-the-art text dissects the psychological processes associated with fundamental legal questions: Is a suspect lying? Will an incarcerated individual be dangerous in the future? Is an eyewitness accurate?
Mark Costanzo and Daniel Krauss’s text show students how psychological science can be used to reduce crime, improve legal decision making, and promote justice.
Costanzo and Krauss show students how psychological science can be used to enhance the gathering of evidence, improve legal decision making, reduce crime, and promote justice.
By using this approach, this volume unites diverse streams of research (i.e., deception, malingering, false memory) that are involved in the reliability of eyewitness statements.
An analysis of ritualistic and religion-related child abuse allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 1–34. Butler, E. W., Fukurai, H., Dimitrius, J.-E., & Krooth, R. (2001). Anatomy of the McMartin child molestation case.
For example, Manson claimed to be the reincarnation of Jesus Christ, and Berkowitz believed he was receiving commands from his neighbor Sam Carr's dog (hence his adopted nickname “Son of Sam”). In contrast, psychopaths are rarely ...
Attorney demeanor --Attorney verbal communications --Attorney paralinguistic communications --Attorney kinesic communications --Attorney-client relationship --Attorney storytelling.
Experts now have a much more nuanced understanding of the psychological implications of being a juror, and advances in technology and neuroscience make the work of rendering a decision in a criminal trial more complicated than ever before.
Psychological Consultation in the Courtroom