As constitutional scholar John Nowak noted when the book was first released, "Professor Choper's Judicial Review and the National Political Process is mandatory reading for anyone seriously attempting to study our constitutional system of government. It is an important assessment of the democratic process and the theoretical and practical role of the Supreme Court." That view is no less true today, as borne out by the countless citations to this landmark work over the decades, including scores in the last few years alone. It is simply part of the foundational canon of constitutional law and political theory, an essential part of the library of scholars, students, and educated readers interested in considering the hard choices inherent in what the courts should decide and how they should decide them.
Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court
The Doctrine of Judicial Review: Its Legal and Historical Basis, and Other Essays
The Supreme Court and Judicial Review
Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society
While the Council came to function as a third house of Parliament, the legislative work of the government and Parliament was meaningfully "juridicized.
In The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy John Agresto traces the development of American judicial power, paying close attention to what he views as the very real threat of judicial supremacy.
These essays seek to explain the judicial systems of different nations and analyze their implications. The book is divided into three parts.
'A clear, readable and fair account of the development of judicial review.'-Ashley Montagu
This text focuses on the legal history and constitutional law relating to judicial review and the reasonable doubt test.
This book deals with one of the greatest challenges for the judiciary in the 21st century.