Judging Inequality: State Supreme Courts and the Inequality Crisis
- ISBN-10
- 161044907X
- ISBN-13
- 9781610449076
- Category
- Political Science
- Pages
- 320
- Language
- English
- Published
- 2021-08-31
- Publisher
- Russell Sage Foundation
- Authors
- James L. Gibson, Michael J. Nelson
Description
Social scientists have convincingly documented soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality in the United States. Missing from this picture of rampant inequality, however, is any attention to the significant role of state law and courts in establishing policies that either ameliorate or exacerbate inequality. In Judging Inequality, political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson demonstrate the influential role of the fifty state supreme courts in shaping the widespread inequalities that define America today, focusing on court-made public policy on issues ranging from educational equity and adequacy to LGBT rights to access to justice to worker’s rights. Drawing on an analysis of an original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century, Judging Inequality documents two ways that state high courts have crafted policies relevant to inequality: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as “upperdogs”). The authors discover that whether court-sanctioned policies lead to greater or lesser inequality depends on the ideologies of the justices serving on these high benches, the policy preferences of their constituents (the people of their state), and the institutional structures that determine who becomes a judge as well as who decides whether those individuals remain in office. Gibson and Nelson decisively reject the conventional theory that state supreme courts tend to protect underdog litigants from the wrath of majorities. Instead, the authors demonstrate that the ideological compositions of state supreme courts most often mirror the dominant political coalition in their state at a given point in time. As a result, state supreme courts are unlikely to stand as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States, instead making decisions compatible with the preferences of political elites already in power. At least at the state high court level, the myth of judicial independence truly is a myth. Judging Inequality offers a comprehensive examination of the powerful role that state supreme courts play in shaping public policies pertinent to inequality. This volume is a landmark contribution to scholarly work on the intersection of American jurisprudence and inequality, one that essentially rewrites the “conventional wisdom” on the role of courts in America’s democracy.
Get the book
Other editions
-
- 1987
- 159 pages
- Paperback
- Cobden Trust
Similar books
-
Inequality Reexamined
By Amartya SenThe noted economist and philosopher Amartya Sen argues that the dictum “all people are created equal” serves largely to deflect attention from the fact that we differ in age, gender, talents, and physical abilities as well as in ...
-
Rousseau's Critique of Inequality: Reconstructing the Second Discourse
By Frederick Neuhouser... inequality. It considered Rousseau's answer to the specific normative question set for him by the Academy of Dijon: is inequality among humans authorized by natural law? The present chapter ... Judging the legitimacy of social inequalities.
-
For Whose Protection?: Reproductive Hazards and Exclusionary Policies in the United States and Britain
By Sally Jane KenneySouthern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company , 169 the court referred to both the EEOC's guidelines that held that state protective laws could create a bona fide occupational qualification and noted the decision of the district court ...
-
Hijacking the Agenda: Economic Power and Political Influence
By Christopher Witko, Jana Morgan, Nathan J. KellyIn Hijacking the Agenda, political scientists Christopher Witko, Jana Morgan, Nathan J. Kelly, and Peter K. Enns examine why Congress privileges the concerns of businesses and the wealthy over those of average Americans.
-
Judging Passions: Moral Emotions in Persons and Groups
By Roger Giner-SorollaThis is the first single-authored volume in the field of psychology dedicated to a separate examination of the major moral and positive emotions.
-
Inequality
By Larry S. TemkinTemkin begins his illuminating examination with a simple question: when is one situation worse than another regarding inequality? In exploring this question, a new approach to understanding inequality emerges.
-
Inequality: Social Class and Its Consequences
By D. Stanley Eitzen, Janis E JohnstonThis book offers an up-to-date portrait of the realities of social class and its consequences in the United States today, focusing on the increasing inequality gap; the shrinking middle class; the myth and realities of social mobility; the ...
-
On Inequality
By Harry G. FrankfurtIn this provocative book, the #1 New York Times bestselling author of On Bullshit presents a compelling and unsettling response to those who believe that the goal of social justice should be economic equality or less inequality.
-
The Politics of Inequality: A Political History of the Idea of Economic Inequality in America
By Michael J ThompsonIn this impassioned book, Michael J. Thompson reaches back into America's rich intellectual history to reclaim the politics of inequality from the distortion of recent American conservatism.
-
Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences
By Charles E. HurstWrong, Dennis H. 1959. “The Functional Theory of Stratification: Some Neglected Considerations. ... Zastrow, Charles. 1982. Introduction to Social Welfare Institutions: Social Problems, Services and Current Issues. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.