Immortalized in Churchill's often quoted assertion that never before "was so much owed by so few," the top-down narrative of the Battle of Britain has been firmly established in British legend: Britain was saved from German invasion by the gallant band of Fighter Command Pilots in their Spitfires and Hurricanes, and the public owed them their freedom. Richard North's radical re-evaluation of the Battle of Britain dismantles this mythical retelling of events. Taking a wider perspective than the much-discussed air war, North takes a fresh look at the conflict as a whole to show that the civilian experience, far from being separate and distinct, was integral to the Battle. This recovery of the people's stolen history demonstrates that Hitler's aim was not the military conquest of England, and that his unattained target was the hearts and minds of British people.
... top 1 percent: See Anthony B. Atkinson, Thomas Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez, “Top Incomes in the Long Run of History,” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 1 (2011): 41–42. When railroad workers went on strike: See Robert E. Weir, ...
Cities are the focus of much of our national life. So it is right that cities are a focus of government policy, after many years of neglect. However, New Labour...
John G. Matsusaka's For the Many or the Few provides the first even-handed and historically based treatment of the subject.
... and the very idea of scientific progress is superfluous as progress is unmeasurable. Kuhn actually asserts that there are no certain methods or methodological rules for evaluating scientific theories, although he does ...
Using more than a thousand eyewitness records, Liberty Is Sweet is a “spirited account” (Gordon S. Wood, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of The Radicalism of the American Revolution) that explores countless connections between the ...
But in this compelling book, Marjorie Kelly and Ted Howard show that there is a new economy emerging, focused on helping everyone thrive while respecting planetary boundaries.
In this fascinating book, New Yorker business columnist James Surowiecki explores a deceptively simple idea: Large groups of people are smarter than an elite few, no matter how brilliant—better at solving problems, fostering innovation, ...
Here we are, here we are; totally telling you our truths.
After all, to err is human. Instead, this book sets forth a national agendaâ€"with state and local implicationsâ€"for reducing medical errors and improving patient safety through the design of a safer health system.
Thirteen is supposed to be unlucky for some, if you're superstitious, and maybe you are. But we, the authors, feel lucky in terms of being able to express ourselves through our writing, and sharing it with you.