The idea of moral evil has always held a special place in philosophy and theology because the existence of evil has implications for the dignity of the human and the limits of human action. Andrew M. Flescher proposes four interpretations of evil, drawing on philosophical and theological sources and using them to trace through history the moral traditions that are associated with them. The first model, evil as the presence of badness, offers a traditional dualistic model represented by Manicheanism. The second, evil leading to goodness through suffering, presents a theological interpretation known as theodicy. Absence of badness—that is, evil as a social construction—is the third model. The fourth, evil as the absence of goodness, describes when evil exists in lieu of the good—the "privation" thesis staked out nearly two millennia ago by Christian theologian St. Augustine. Flescher extends this fourth model—evil as privation—into a fifth, which incorporates a virtue ethic. Drawing original connections between Augustine and Aristotle, Flescher’s fifth model emphasizes the formation of altruistic habits that can lead us to better moral choices throughout our lives. Flescher eschews the temptation to think of human agents who commit evil as outside the norm of human experience. Instead, through the honing of moral skills and the practice of attending to the needs of others to a greater degree than we currently do, Flescher offers a plausible and hopeful approach to the reality of moral evil.
This book explores a constructive role for the concept of evil in practical ethics.
From pre-Christian times until the present day, philosophers have discussed whether, given evil, belief in God can logically be maintained. Theists and non-theists remain unconvinced by one another's arguments. This...
If the infidel denies a full, just and exact retribution of this sinful world, and also an atonement for sin, then he is shut up to the admission of a selfish, malignant Deity. He may call him benevolent; but it is a name without the ...
of Realrepugnanz applied to morality can be drawn from Failure where Kant opposes God's holiness as law-giver with moral evil, God's goodness opposes the physically counter-purposive, and God's justice opposes the disproportion in the ...
Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there...
( of values ) inheres universally in the meaning of moral freedom . Second Aporia . How can the will be free as against the principle to which as a moral will it ought to be subject ? Must it then not be at the same time determined and ...
Demonstrates the systematic connection between Kant's ethics and his philosophy of history.
face evil comes out of the worst feelings and impulses , while political evil has other sources . ... ( I acknowledge , however , that there must be an appreciable moral difference between doing evil while resisting it and instigating ...