Through transcripts, memos, and analysis, Representative John C. Conyers, Jr. and the House Judiciary Committee reveal how the Bush administration again and again assumed more power than the Constitution allows, and circumvented the traditional checks and balances of our system. From ignoring laws that forbid torturing, to determining that the president himself—not the courts—can decide the reach of the law, to using creative counselors to recast the statutory law or the Constitution itself, the administration’s approach to power was, at its core, little more than a restatement of Richard Nixon’s famous rationalization of presidential misdeeds: “When the president does it, that means it’s not illegal.” Reining in the Imperial Presidency includes forty-seven separate recommendations, including calls for continued committee investigation, a blue ribbon commission to fully investigate administration activities, and independent criminal probes. Conyer writes, “The Constitution has been sorely tested over the last eight years. But . . . I am confident in our capacity to self-correct. Doing so will require much hard work and diligence, and that effort only continues with the release of this Report. Our work is far from complete.”
Through transcripts, memos, and analysis, Representative John C. Conyers, Jr. and the House Judiciary Committee reveal how the Bush administration again and again assumed more power than the Constitution allows, and circumvented the ...
The presidential historian charts the progression of American power from George Washington to George W. Bush, revealing the exercise of power through the office as it has developed into an "imperial" seat of authority, in an updated edition ...
Eileen Sullivan, “Five Policy Clashes between John Bolton and President Trump,” New York Times, September 10, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/10/us/politics/trump-bolton.html. 32. Peter Baker, Mujib Mashal, and Michael Crowley, ...
But what about the network's coverage of liberal Republican John Anderson, who was viewed by some as the darling of the media establishment? In terms of favorable stories, he ranked behind Reagan and Carter with 28 percent—a rather high ...
On the purge campaign, see Sidney M. Milkis, The President and the Parties: The Transformation of the American Party System since the New Deal (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), chap. 4; and Susan Dunn, Roosevelt's Purge: How ...
As the fortieth anniversary of the Nixon resignation approaches, it is time to take a fresh look at Watergate's impact on the American political system and to consider its significance for the historical reputation of the president ...
Within the terms of a liberal legal critique, the Bush administration was notoriously “imperial,”10 guilty of 9 ... Reining in the Imperial Presidency: Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush.
27 As 2002 closed, observers suggested that Bush had “created one of the as part of a most powerful White Houses in at least a generation”28 specific strategy aimed at recovering executive powers ceded to—or seized by—Congress during ...
Thus, other branches can still check the executive branch through political means. As long as presidents are concerned with public opinion, Christenson and Kriner contend that fears of an imperial presidency are overblown.
Ray has also brought the book fully up-to-date, addressing the latest events in American foreign policy, including the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the killing of Bin Laden, the WikiLeaks scandal and its aftermath, the impact of social ...