Jason Edward Black examines the ways the US government’s rhetoric and American Indian responses contributed to the policies of Native-US relations throughout the nineteenth century’s removal and allotment eras. Black shows how these discourses together constructed the perception of the US government and of American Indian communities. Such interactions—though certainly not equal—illustrated the hybrid nature of Native-US rhetoric in the nineteenth century. Both governmental, colonizing discourse and indigenous, decolonizing discourse shaped arguments, constructions of identity, and rhetoric in the colonial relationship. American Indians and the Rhetoric of Removal and Allotment demonstrates how American Indians decolonized dominant rhetoric through impeding removal and allotment policies. By turning around the US government’s narrative and inventing their own tactics, American Indian communities helped restyle their own identities as well as the government’s. During the first third of the twentieth century, American Indians lobbied for the successful passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 and the Indian New Deal of 1934, changing the relationship once again. In the end, Native communities were granted increased rhetorical power through decolonization, though the US government retained an undeniable colonial influence through its territorial management of Natives. The Indian Citizenship Act and the Indian New Deal—as the conclusion of this book indicates—are emblematic of the prevalence of the duality of US citizenship that fused American Indians to the nation, yet segregated them on reservations. This duality of inclusion and exclusion grew incrementally and persists now, as a lasting effect of nineteenth-century Native-US rhetorical relations.
How the United States government tried to define, displace, and control indigenous peoples while American Indians refused to surrender their voices
1833 1834 1835 1836 Chickasaws' and Creeks' forced removal from their lands begins. ... The Quapaw of Arkansassign a treaty to remove to Indian Territory in the northeast corner bordering Kansas and Missouri.
Dennison Wheelock, an Oneida attorney and an early vice-president of the SAI (who had attended Carlisle), delivered a paper at the third meeting of the society in which he denounced any policies or practices, including educational ...
Stannard, D. E. American Holocaust: Columbus and the Conquest of the New World. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1992. Explores the connection between disease, depredation, enslavement, and massacre and between racism and genocide ...
Cherokee National Records, Freedmen, roll 81, ohs; H. Price to the Secretary of the Interior, February 12, 1884, 48th Cong., 2d sess., rg 46, Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, Sen 48A –H12, na. 71. McLoughlin, After the Trail of Tears ...
Creating Memorials, Building Identities: The Politics of Memory in the Black Atlantic. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press. Savage, Kirk. 2009. Monument Wars: Washington, D.C., the National Mall, and the Transformation of the ...
Louis A. Pérez Jr., On Becoming Cuban: Identity, Nationality, and Culture (1999). ... Michael H. Hunt, The American Ascendancy: How the United States Gained and Wielded Global Dominance (2007). Michael Lienesch, In the Beginning: ...
American Indians and the Rhetoric of Removal and Allotment. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2015. Bowes, John P. Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2016.
Chapter 6, the book's first climax, opens with Eaton's assertion that by the mid- 1820s, the Cherokees “were almost as progressive as the white people of the state [of Georgia] of that time,” which she backs up by a counternarrative of ...
A key component of Johnson's antipoverty policy was the Office of Economic Opportunity ( OEO ) , which had a commitment to grassroots political activism to solve problems of poverty at the community level . One of the major supporters ...