An astute analysis of today's political chaos showing that the current period of disruptive change is part of a recurring pattern in American politics. What's happening to American politics? Old political norms seem to be slipping away. Politics has progressively become angrier, new movements keep butting into the public square, and more and more of the unwritten rules that governed American politics for decades have fallen away. Naturally, many are anxious. Former congressional aide and presidential campaign veteran Frank J. DiStefano argues that this political turmoil feels disquietingly new only because most of us know so little about the history of American politics. In this book, he puts the present era in historical context, showing that America is facing its next realignment, a period of destruction and rebirth in which old political coalitions decay and new parties rise to replace them. DiStefano explains how the history of past realignments connects to contemporary politics. He examines clashes between Hamilton's Federalists and Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans, the rise of Andrew Jackson, the traumatic collapse of the Whigs, the populist revolt of William Jennings Bryan, and the formation of our New Deal party system of today. He explores America's periodic explosions of moral crusading called great awakenings. He clarifies the real ideas and philosophical forces that make up our politics, from liberty and virtue to populism and progressivism, showing how their interaction is now remaking our parties into something new. Will this realignment be a quick renewal as we adapt our politics for a future with new problems, or do we face years of disruption, dangerous movements, and chaotic politics before we rebuild? This book shows that, with a knowledge of history, all of us can help shape the politics of the coming decades and restore our trust in the American Dream.
Kathryn Pearson and Eric Schickler, “Discharge Petitions, Agenda Control, and the Congressional Committee System, 1929–1976,” Journal of Politics 71, 4 (2009): 1238–56. Pearson made the original discovery of the discharge petitions at ...
They found McCarthy too crude and ambitious to be admitted to the leadership circle, but still they sought to make use of him and his following. So Robert A. Taft, ... William S. White, The Taft Story: Biography of Robert ...
Alger, Dean. 1987. “Television, Perceptions of Reality and the Presidential Election of '84.” PS: Political Science & Politics 20: 49–57. ... Hampton, Keith, Lauren Sessions Goulet, Lee Rainie and Kristen Purcell ...
Stokes , Donald E. “ Party Loyalty and the Likelihood of Deviating Elections . ... Sundquist , James L. “ The 1984 Election : How Much Realignment ? ” Brookings Review 3 ... “ The 1980 Election : Profile and Historical Perspective .
Taking issue with widely accepted theories of dealignment and party decay, Paulson argues that the most profound realignment in American history occurred in the 1960s, and he presents an alternative theory of realignment and party revival.
This book is about the phenomenon of realignment in American politics.
Ferejohn , John A. 1977. On the decline of competition in congressional elections . American Journal of Political Science , 21 : 523-42 . Fiorina , Morris P. 1981. Retrospective voting in American national elections .
Choosing Sides: Alignment and Realignment in the Third World
National Journal , 1989 ) ; Barone and Ujifusa , The Almanac of American Politics 1992 ( Washington , D.C .: National Journal , 1991 ) ; Barone and Ujifusa , The Almanac of American Politics 1994 ( Washington , D.C .
Webb's candidacy was initially promoted to the DSCC by two Nebraskans, not only former senator Bob Kerrey, a Democrat, but also an incumbent senator, Chuck Hagel, a Republican. Still, once Webb defeated a more liberal Democrat in the ...