Are you a grant maker, manager or evaluator who must assess your work to improve as well as be accountable for the use of resources and results? Does the project, program or organization you fund, manage or evaluate contend with substantial uncertainty about what to do and what will be the results? Do you thus experience constant change and unexpected and unforeseeable actors and factors in your intervention? Do you need to know what you are achieving and how in real time? And therefore, do you seek an alternative to conventional monitoring and evaluation of social change results? If yes, then you are the audience for this book. Beginning in 2002, working closely with co-evaluators and commissioners of evaluations, the author developed Outcome Harvesting to enable evaluators, grant makers, and managers to identify, formulate, verify, and make sense of changes that interventions have influenced in a broad range of cutting–edge innovation and development projects and programs around the world. Over these years, he led Outcome Harvesting evaluative exercises involving almost 500 non-governmental organizations, networks, government agencies, funding agencies, community-based organizations, research institutes and university programs. In over fifty evaluations, with forty co-evaluators he has harvested thousands of outcomes on six continents. Outcome Harvesting has proven useful in evaluations of a great diversity of initiatives: human rights advocacy, political, economic and environmental advocacy, arts and culture, health systems, information and communication technology, conflict and peace, water and sanitation, taxonomy for development, violence against women, rural development, organic agriculture, participatory democracy, waste management, public sector reform, good governance, eLearning, social accountability, and business competition, amongst others. In this book, the author explains the steps of Outcome Harvesting and how to customize them according to the nine underlying principles. He shares his experience and gives practical advice on how to work with Outcome Harvesting and remain true to its essential features.
From evaluation pioneer Michael Quinn Patton, this book introduces the principles-focused evaluation (P-FE) approach and demonstrates its relevance and application in a range of settings.
Outcome harvesting is thus an evaluation approach that collects evidence of what has been achieved and then works backward to determine whether and how the efforts of social innovators and their interventions contributed to observed and ...
Description Figure 6.3 The Stages of Outcome Mapping Outcome harvesting, on the other hand, is retrospective. It “does not measure progress towards predetermined objectives or outcomes, but rather, collects or “harvests” evidence of ...
To overcome these challenges, the evaluation adopted outcome harvesting as the main approach. Outcome harvesting is a process of backward analysis where the evaluation starts with understanding what has changed ...
Retrieved from https://www.rattle.com/ respond/ Pope, C. (2016, January 12). Major Tom turns into light. Rattle. ... (https://littlefreelibrary.org/ ) • Words Without Walls: Writers on Addiction, Violence, and Incarceration.
This handbook is the product of an interdisciplinary effort to provide science-based guidance for the evaluation of One Health and other integrated approaches to health.
The evaluation was guided by the evaluation questions and focused on the programme's observed outcomes and achievements. ... Applying outcome harvesting allowed the evaluation team to include a diversity of perspectives and allowed ...
In this landmark collection, the voices of pathmakers and innovators in peacebuilding evaluation are assembled to provide new direction for the field.
Finally, this book examines the roles of funders such as impact investors, philanthropic foundations, and international aid agencies, laying out how they can best enable meaningful performance measurement.
They emerged during the 1990s as influential actors in national development and have, in some cases, assumed major responsibility for the delivery of basic services (Clayton, Oakley, & Taylor, 2000).The next section discusses the ...