Most historians of the American presidency—walking in lockstep with today’s hard-Left academic establishment—favor presidents who were big-government statists and globalists. They dislike presidents who lowered taxes, protected American workers, and avoided getting the United States entangled in foreign conflicts that had nothing to do with protecting the American people. It is through that prism that they see all of American history. It’s time for a change. Nowadays, with socialism massively discredited and internationalism facing more opposition than it has since before World War II, it’s time to reevaluate what the Leftist historians have told us. Donald Trump was elected president pledging to put America First, as any nation’s leader should put his or her own people first. There needs to be an America-First reevaluation of him and his predecessors. This book, therefore, rates the presidents not on the basis of criteria developed by socialist internationalist historians, but on their fidelity to the United States Constitution and to the powers, and limits to those powers, of the president as delineated by the Founding Fathers. America’s presidents are rated on the extent to which they put America First—not in the sense of a narrow isolationism, but whether they really advanced the interests of the American people. This upends the conventional wisdom about a great deal of American history and present-day reality, and is intended to do so. This book offers what should be the only criteria for rating the occupants of the White House: were they good for America?
Authors Ridings and McIver polled more than seven hundred historians and academics to determine who were the best, the worst, and even the most mediocre presidents. Each survey participant was...
This book offers what should be the only criteria for rating the occupants of the White House: were they good for America?
The whole reason that Chester Arthur ended up as vice president was an effort by the Republicans to placate Conkling and to make sure that New York would throw its support behind Garfield. So, Arthur was an accidental vice president, ...
Theodore Roosevelt and Wilson ex- changed positions in the top two groups, and Lyndon Johnson (not rated by ... The results of his poll were published in 1987.10 In 1982 Steve Neal, a political reporter for the Chicago Tribune, ...
Rating the Presidents, from Washington Through Ronald Reagan Robert K. Murray, Tim H. Blessing. on the subject of disctimination ... The nomination of Judge Robert Bork was disapproved by more than three - quarrets of the respondents .
I also identify in the book whether our presidents were balanced, atyplical, conflicted or unbalanced. Our greatest presidents were balanced.
This current edition also includes a new assessment of Bill Clinton -- who has admitted lying to his family, his aides, his cabinet, and the American people.
... 127, 128, 130, 146 Khmer Rouge forces, SS Mayaguez crew hostages and, 138 Kim Jung-un, 174 Knox-Porter resolution, ... 71, 146 Line of succession, 64 Lloyd George, David (British Prime Minister), 98 C C-SPAN presidential poll, 183, ...
195 “inherit the most dangerous”: Harry Anderson, with Rich Thomas and Pamela Lynn Abraham, “The U.S. Economy in Crisis,” Newsweek, January 19, ... 195 Gross Domestic Product had declined 1.5 percent: Sutch and Carter, Table Ca9-19.
" This book provides useful criticism of these presidential rankings. It is arranged chronologically, and discusses each presidential performance and each ranking study in detail.