The concept of vulnerability has not been unequivocally interpreted either in regional or in universal international legal instruments. This book analyses the work of the EU and the Council of Europe in ascertaining a clear framework or a set of criteria suitable to determine those who should be considered vulnerable and disadvantaged. It also explores the measures required to protect their human rights. Key questions can be answered by analysing the different methods used to determine the levels of protection offered by the two European systems. These questions include whether the Convention and the case law of the Strasbourg Court, the monitoring mechanisms of the Council of Europe, EU law and the case law of the European Court of Justice enhance the protection of vulnerable groups and expand the protection of their rights, or, alternatively, whether they are mainly used to fill in relatively minor gaps or occasional lapses in national rights guarantees. The analysis also shows the extent to which these two European systems provide analogous, or indeed divergent, standards and how any such divergence might be problematic in light of the EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights.
This booklet provides broad information about the Protecting Vulnerable Groups Scheme.
Amendment to the Protecting Vulnerable Groups (PVG) Scheme and Self Directed Support (SDS)
This book will review the protection of vulnerable groups under international human rights law.
The Protecting Vulnerable Groups Scheme Review: Terms of Reference
Information on Protecting Vulnerable Groups (PVG) Scheme and Self Directed Support (SDS).
vulnerable groups (Kadirzhanov and Mamashev v. Russia, 2014). However, ECtHR reconsidered this position as the political situation changed. In the most recent case T.K. and S.R. v. Russia (2019), in light of recent international reports ...
geographic location and gender, their vulnerability becomes compounded.119 Examples of how disability-based discrimination hinders the enjoyment of the rights of children with disabilities are provided in paragraphs 31 and 35.
The Court has relied on children's vulnerability to remind us that Article 3 is so fundamental to warrant proscription of slaps in ... 2 Kiyutin v. Russia, Application No. 2700/10, Judgment of 10 March 2011. See generally paras. 6–15.
In 2010, the Scottish Government is introducing a new membership scheme that will replace and improve upon the current disclosure arrangements for people who work with vulnerable groups.
The right of adults with sound mind to consent to treatment or risk their own health for the benefit of the community in a clinical trial is unequivocally recognised by the law.