WHY THE SOUTH LOST What led to the downfall of the Confederacy? The distinguished professors of history represented in this volume examine the following crucial factors in the South’s defeat: ECONOMIC—RICHARD N. CURRENT of the University of Wisconsin attributes the victory of the North to fundamental economic superiority so great that the civilian resources of the South were dissipated under the conditions of war. MILITARY—T. HARRY WILLIAMS of Louisiana State University cites the deficiencies of Confederate strategy and military leadership, evaluating the influence on both sides of Baron Jomini, a 19th-century strategist who stressed position warfare and a rapid tactical offensive. DIPLOMATIC—NORMAN A. GRAERNER of the University of Illinois holds that the basic reason England and France decided not to intervene on the side of the South was simply that to have done so would have violated the general principle of non-intervention to which they were committed. SOCIAL—DAVID DONALD of Columbia University offers the intriguing thesis that an excess of Southern democracy killed the Confederacy. From the ordinary man in the ranks to Jefferson Davis himself, too much emphasis was placed on individual freedom and not enough on military discipline. POLITICAL—DAVID M. POTTER of Stanford University suggests that the deficiencies of President Davis as a civil and military leader turner the balance, and that the South suffered from the lack of a second well-organized political party to force its leadership into competence.
A description of the military operations of the Civil War includes analyses of the leadership and strategies of both sides of the conflict 'The beginning student of Civil War military history will find the work an unmatched guide to how war ...
2. New York Observer, November 17, 1864, as quoted in Emerson David Fite, Social and Industrial Conditions in the North During the Civil War (New York: Peter Smith, 1930), 283. 3. W. T. Crane, “Thanksgiving Festivities at Fort Pulaski, ...
Stoeckl, Edouard de, 92 Streight, Abel D., 212 Strozier, Charles, 247 Stuart, J. E. B. (Jeb), 112, 124, 139, 144, 148, 154, 160–162, 163, 165, 166, 171, 187, 191, 192, 264 Swinton, William, 195 Sydnor, Charles, 23, 24 ...
The characters in the book-within-a-book are all taken from history, and the military tactics and stragegies are based on those of the actual war. The novel is followed by a lively and informative factual essay of the Civil War."--
Why the Confederacy Lost provides a parallel volume, written by today's leading authorities. Provocatively argued and engagingly written, this work reminds us that the hard-won triumph of the North was far from inevitable.
Those initial thoughts drew strength from Mary Bilder, Jim Cronin, Dennis Dickerson, Kevin Kenny, Jim O'Toole, Alan Rogers, David Shi, Joel Wolfe, and Howard Bloom, who all urged me to throw ideas at the wall and see what stuck.
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 2011. Downs, Jim. Sick From Freedom: African-American Illness and Suffering During the Civil War and Reconstruction. New York, 2012. Drabelle, Dennis. The Great American Railroad War. New York, 2012.
The Army of the Confederacy grew thin while Union dinner tables groaned and Northern canning operations kept Grant's army strong. In Starving the South, Andrew Smith takes a gastronomical look at the war's outcome and legacy.
“Pieces of a Southern Autobiography”: I wrote a longer version of this essay at the invitation of John Boles, who has edited a collection of autobiographies called Shapers of Southern History (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2004).
The classic novel of speculative history, showing how the South could have won the Civil War, is accompanied by the author's essay on his work.