This perceptive book analyzes the scope of the duty to prevent genocide of China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US in light of the due diligence standard under conventional, customary, and peremptory international law. It expounds the positive obligations of these five states to act both within and without the Security Council context to prevent or suppress an imminent or ongoing genocide.
This perceptive book analyzes the scope of the duty to prevent genocide of China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US in light of the due diligence standard under conventional, customary, and peremptory international law.
Diehl , Paul F. " United Nations Interventions and Recurring Conflict . " International Organization Vol . 50 ( 1996 ) : 683-700 . ... Duffield , Mark and John Prendergast . “ Sovereignty and Intervention after the Cold War : Lessons ...
be met by either of two alternatives: the perpetrator intended to destroy a protected group 'in whole' or 'in part'.72 ... 932 ('It does not have to be proved that the accused intended to “entirely destroy one group in the whole world”, ...
This volume is about the failure to prevent genocide in Rwanda in 1994.
'The Responsibility to Protect' provides a comprehensive view on how this contemporary principle has developed and analyzes how to best apply it to current humanitarian crises.
This book provides a fascinating insight into the worldviews of activists which will be of interest to practitioners and researchers of human rights activism, humanitarian advocacy and peace building.
This book explores the extent to which Responsibility to Protect shifts our understanding of both the potential and practice of international law.
Together, this collection of subjects establishes a new legal discipline, which the author Michael Bazyler labels "Post-Holocaust Law."
281–306 Darfur: The Ambiguous Genocide, New York: Cornell University Press, 2005 Pulos, Michael, 'Hiding Corpses Within ... 1997 Reisman, W. Michael, 'Responses to Crimes of Discrimination and Genocide: An Appraisal of the Convention on ...
But he insists that justice requires only that they do their fair share. David Miller, “Taking Up the Slack? Responsibility and Justice in Situations of Partial Compliance,” in Responsibility and Distributive Justice, ed.