U.S. Nuclear Deterrence Policy: Do We Have It Right? Assessing American Nuclear Policy Based on Feasibility, Acceptability, and Suitability, Counterpo

Description

The Cold War is over and the Soviet Union is gone. Africa, the South Pacific, and Latin America are nuclear weapon free zones. China is a most favored trading partner. The United States and Russia have dismantled hundreds of nuclear weapons and decommissioned scores of bombers and submarines. There is a myriad of international treaties designed to create a world without threat of nuclear holocaust. So why do states and other actors continue to seek nuclear weapons? Iran is in the media with its thinly veiled efforts to establish itself as a nuclear power. On 6 September 2007, Israel bombed a facility in Syria they believed to be a nuclear threat. North Korea is fattening its international bargaining power with its nuclear program. Pakistan, a nation teetering on the edge of political upheaval, has nuclear missiles. Transnational terrorist organizations relish the thought of acquiring an atomic device. Today's nuclear world is not the one our parent's knew. The purpose of this paper is to assess U.S. nuclear deterrence policy to see how it has evolved and if it is appropriate for today's changed security environment.During the Cold War the United States built an immense nuclear arsenal to deter nuclear war with the Soviet Union; a clear and valid raison d'etre. The Cold War is over; has been over for more than 10 years. The Soviet Union is gone. Our Armed Forces got a medal for it. Africa, the South Pacific, Outer Space, and Latin America are nuclear weapons free zones. Today, we have the Limited Test Ban Treaty, the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, an Outer Space Treaty, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), three Strategic Arms Limitation Treaties, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, two Strategic Arms Reduction Treaties, and the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty. The convergent thesis of these and other international agreements is a movement to remove nuclear arsenals from the options list of nation-states. The cornerstone of the movement to create a nuclear weapons free world is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The NPT is a universally recognized agreement among 136 nuclear and non-nuclear nations to prevent the expansion of nuclear weapons to non-nuclear states. The days of living under the cloud of "Mutual Assured Destruction" have passed. So what is the purpose of retaining nuclear weapons in this new environment? Why are we investing tax dollars in new nuclear technology and upgrading our weapons stockpile? Where is the peace dividend?

Get the book

Amazon.com

Search the book

eBay.com

Search the book

Similar books

• 

  China’s Evolving Nuclear Deterrent: Major Drivers and Issues for the United States

  By Eric Heginbotham, Michael Nixon, Forrest E. Morgan

  This report analyzes international and domestic factors that will affect China's approach to nuclear deterrence, how those drivers may evolve over the next 15 years, and what impact they are likely to have.

• 

  The Future of Extended Deterrence: The United States, NATO, and Beyond

  By Stéfanie von Hlatky, Andreas Wenger

  In-depth and multifaceted, The Future of Extended Deterrence is an essential resource for policy practitioners and scholars of nuclear deterrence, arms control, missile defense, and the NATO alliance.

• 

  U.S. Nuclear Weapons: Changes in Policy and Force Structure

  By Amy F. Woolf

  The Bush Administration conducted a review of US nuclear weapons force posture during its first year in office. Although the review sought to adjust US nuclear posture to address changes...

• 

  Nuclear Weapons in U. S. National Security Policy: Past, Present, and Prospects

  By Amy F. Woolf

  Contents: (1) Introduction; (2) Nuclear Weapons in U.S. National Security Policy: The Evolving Role of Nuclear Weapons; Need for a National Debate?; (3) Defining Deterrence: Deterrence, in Theory; Deterrence, During the Cold War; Deterrence ...

• 

  Driving to Zero: Defining Credible Nuclear Deterrence in an Era of Disarmament - Covering New START Treaty and the Nuclear...

  By U. S. Military, Department of Defense, U. S. Air Force

  This unique study examines the issue of nuclear deterrence and disarmament. Nuclear deterrence, like climate change, is a devilishly complex issue that tends to polarize its community of experts.

• 

  The Case for U.S. Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century

  By Brad Roberts

  This book is a counter to the conventional wisdom that the United States can and should do more to reduce both the role of nuclear weapons in its security strategies and the number of weapons in its arsenal.

• 

  U.S. nuclear policy in the 21st century a fresh look at national strategy and requirements: final report

  Yet the world continues to be unpredictable and dangerous. Relations with Russia and China have improved dramatically in the last ten years but remain uncertain. Both states continue to emphasize and modernize their nuclear arsenals.

• 

  Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age

  By Keith B. Payne

  Keith Payne begins by asking, "Did we really learn how to deter predictably and reliably during the Cold War?

• 

  Nuclear Deterrence In U.s.-soviet Relations

  By Keith B. Payne

  This book critically examines U.S. attempts to establish a nuclear deterrent against the Soviet Union and offers new approaches to dealing with the changing strategic environment.

• 

  Managing U.S. Nuclear Operations in the 21st Century

  By Austin Long, Charles Glaser, Brian Radzinsky

  In deciding to acquire nuclear-powered submarines, Australia canceled a contract with a French company for ... Writing about extended deterrence, assurance, and alliance nuclear issues, even after forty years working on these issues in ...