In this book, Cane aims to confront the view that morality stands to law as critical standard to conventional practice.
These essays explore the tensions between law as a protector of individual liberty and as a tool of democratic self-rule, and introduce debates about adjudication and the contribution of feminist approaches to the philosophy of law.
The two Towers were completely destroyed, as were a number of the other buildings comprising the World Trade Center that were also leased to the Silverstein group. The reconstruction cost and lost rental income exceeds the ...
The essays explain that given uncertainty of what people perceive as the line between public reason and their religion convictions, the inability of public reason to resolve some difficulty questions, such as what we owe to higher animals, ...
ABOUT THE SERIES: The Very Short Introductions series from Oxford University Press contains hundreds of titles in almost every subject area. These pocket-sized books are the perfect way to get ahead in a new subject quickly.
In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application.
John Finnis is a pre-eminent legal, moral and political philosopher. This volume contains over 25 essays by leading international scholars of philosophy and law who critically engage with issues at the heart of Finnis's work.
In this book I argue for an approach that conceives human rights as both moral and legal rights.
Stephen Darwall presents a series of essays that explore the view that morality is second-personal, entailing mutual accountability and the authority to address demands.
Drawing from numerous examples of conflicts between law and morality, Greeawalt illustrates in detail the positions and predicaments of potential lawbreakers and lawmakers alike.
col. 296 (9 Apr. 1827) (Substituting direct for indirect speech). '6 See infra, text accompanying notes 65-70. '7 The maxim was a primary ground for the judgment of Bayley and Holroyd J] in Ilott v. Wilkes. '8 4 Bing. 628, 130 ER. 911.