In 2005, as part of its research activities in the field of investment treaty law and arbitration, the Investment Treaty Forum at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law organized two very successful public conferences in London addressing the issues of 'Nationality and Investment Treaty Claims' and 'Fair and Equitable Treatment in Investment Treaty Law.' This publication records the presentations given by very distinguished experts in the field. The first conference addressed a central issue in international law. Nationality sits at the heart of the debate over the rights and participation of private parties in international relations. In international investment law, nationality constitutes one of the central criteria defining the scope of application of international investment agreements such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention or the several thousands bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and free trade agreements (FTAs). Topics addressed at the conference include the issue of nationality of physical and legal persons, the requirements for substantive and continuous nationality, as well as the issue of nationality in derivative actions and indirect claims. The second conference dealt with potentially the most important and elusive obligation imposed on States by international investment treaties: the fair and equitable treatment standard. The elements that are usually cited by the case law and by legal scholars in the attempt to describe the meaning of the fair and equitable treatment standard include very broad concepts that are open to differing interpretations depending fundamentally on the perceived objectives of the international investment system. Among the topics addressed at the conference were the application of the fair and equitable treatment standard in customary international law and in investment treaty practice; equivalent standards under domestic administrative law; the relationship between the fair and equitable standard and expropriation; and the relevance of the conduct of the investor in determining a breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard.
Criminal Procedure: From First Contact to Appeal, 2/E John L. Worrall, "California State University, San Bernardino" ISBN: 0205493106 This text is a comprehensive introduction to criminal procedure, from the point where individuals first ...
Supreme Court of Canada Manual: Practice and Advocacy
Appellate Court Practice: Win Your Arguments on Appeal
Federal Post-conviction Guidebook: A Primer for Attorneys and Defendants, Family and Friends Criminal Appeals 28 USC 2255 and 28 USC...
( 4 ) The Central Division comprises the counties of Benton , Boone , Callaway , Camden , Cole , Cooper , Hickory , Howard , Miller , Moniteau , Morgan , Osage , and Pettis . Court for the Central Division shall be held at Jefferson ...
Since the Torres decision , there has been a great deal of litigation regarding whether a notice of appeal that contains some indication of the appellants ' identities but does not name the appellants is sufficiently specific .
Hull) . . . .. 20! x.' .. . .....lu 41mm ...zu Kn .. ....43 In)... . .. DJIZ (loll) ... . M: I”). 41mm..................zu '. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..96 Ila)... 41(6) . ............._ . 27! I“... 1.
KASER , M. , ' Das römische Zivilprozessrecht ' , in Rechtsgeschichte des Altertums , III / 4 , München , C.H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung , 1966 , 570 p . KASER , M. , Römisches Privatrecht , München , C.H. Beck'sche ...
Any lawyer, however experienced, who has the carriage of an application for special leave to appeal in the High Court should regard this comprehensive and penetrating work as compulsory reading." ¿ His Honour Justice Patrick Keane of the ...
See 12 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 3152, at 217 (1973); Caballero, Is There an Over-Exercise of Local Rule-Making Powers by the United States District Courts?, 24 Fed. Bar News 325 (1977).