This book presents the first systematic analysis of artistic techniques and terminology related to the rendering of light and shade in Dutch and Flemish art from the early-seventeenth to the mid-eighteenth century. It traces a shift in aesthetic perception, which is visible in the handling of chiaroscuro in Dutch and Flemish art in the course of 150 years, and challenges the view, widespread since Julius von Schlosser's influential survey of European art and literarure, that Netherlandish art was mainly uninventive. In their discussions Netherlandish writers of art theory drew on a) earlier and foreign art literature, b) their insights, mainly as painters, into workshop practice, c) observation of nature (including natural sciences) and d) aesthetic judgement. This volume investigates the different extents to which Netherlandisch writers on art depended on these four aspects as they devised their concepts of chiaroscuro and how this relates to contemporary pictorial practice. Statements on chiaroscuro in the writings of Karel van Mander, Philips Angel, Willem Goeree, Samuel van Hoogstraten, Gerard de Lairesse, Arnold Houbraken and Jacob Campo Weyerman have been compared with paintings of the period to test the writers' statements against the artists'methods. The comparison shows that writers of art theory described partly the same or similar methods to achieve effects of chiaroscuro that artists used in their works, which is understandable, given that most of them were active as artists themselves. Yet there are also divergences, especially when it comes to the question whether artists should value rendering natural effects over pictorial coherence. Dutch writers of art regarded natural impression as a crucial aim of art, but they often struggled with reconciling nature and aesthetic requirements in their arguments. In the art of the Netherlands, however, we can observe frequently that aesthetic and pictorial composition came before nature.
4.5-62; Delft, Cambridge, Fort Worth 1988-89, pp. 1051i; and Taylor 1995, pp. 146-51. For the symbolic significance of flowers, see Amsterdam, 's Hertogenbosch 1982, chap. 2, and Taylor 1995, pp. 28-76. 2. Bakker in Amsterdam 1984., p.
Bijna zeventig jaar na de dood van Hendrik Werkman (1882-1945) heeft Museum Drachten een unieke tentoonstelling samengesteld over drie generaties Werkman.
Published on the occasion of an exhibition held at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, October 11, 2015-January 18, 2016 and the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, February 20-May 29, 2016.
This book revises that image, showing that the small but vibrant Dutch city produced a wide range of artworks, including luxurious tapestries and silver objects, as well as sophisticated paintings for the court at The Hague and for ...
The Low Countries: Arts and Society in Flanders and the Netherlands. A Yearbook 1998-99
The work and artistic ambitions of Edvard Munch (1863-1944) and Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890) show interesting parallels.
This volume examines late medieval and early modern warfare in France, the Hispanic World, and the Dutch Republic through the lens of trauma and memory studies.
Secession: Bik Van Der Pol : Past Imperfect : 5.5.-26.6.2005
The Psychopathologies of Cognitive Capitalism: Part Three emerges from deliberations that took place during the symposia in Berlin and Los Angeles.
Face to Face with Vincent Van Gogh