Social media are becoming the dominant source of information for significant parts of our societies. There are numerous positive aspects of these media, such as their ability to mobilise for a political cause. No one can deny that social media strengthen free speech in general, allow greater and quicker flows of ideas across societies, and add to the quality of life. Yet at the same time, social media may sometimes negatively impact the public debate. This paper analyses how social media platforms influ-ence democracy in Western countries and makes recommendations on how to address the risks that arise effectively. The first section describes the phenomena of fake news, echo chambers and social bots. The paper then discusses the ways in which fake news, bots and bubbles impact the public debate. Examples from the recent past (the US, French and German elections and the UK referendum) are debated. In the third part, the paper outlines the current regulatory framework in which social media operate, both in the EU member states and in the US. The peculiar status of ‘Internet intermediaries’ is also analysed.The following section discusses the different voluntary measures self-imposed by social media companies to eradicate fake news from their feeds. Their effectiveness is assessed.In the fifth section, a novel way of fighting fake news is introduced. The author suggests that social media platforms should be considered media companies and that they should be regulated by modi-fied versions of existing press laws, adapted to suit the new technology. The creation of a ‘notice and correct’ procedure, as it is tentatively called, would provide an effective tool to stop lies from spread-ing, allowing affected parties, public or private, to protect their rights. By making the social media plat-forms jointly responsible for the content they publish, governments would create the right incentives for companies to adapt their business models and to modify the construction of their algorithms and policies. The concept of a ‘notice and correct’ procedure is discussed in the context of the freedom of speech: the risks and challenges are analysed. It is underlined that any attempt at censorship must not be tolerated.In the final section, the paper discusses the improvement of e-literacy as an additional, viable and long-term solution to the problem of fake news. It concludes by identifying the right conditions under which the ‘notice and correct’ procedure could be implemented.
Journalism, fake news & disinformation: handbook for journalism education and training
The volume explores visual and data dissemination, business practices, international perspectives and case studies.
This book provides journalism students with an easy-to-read yet theoretically rich guide to the dialectics, contradictions, problems, and promises encapsulated in the term 'journalism ethics'.
The Fake News Factory: Tales from BBC-land
How much information can we possibly process, and what is the internet doing to our attention spans? Ultimately this book answers one of the greatest questions of the age: how can we all be smarter consumers of news?
In this book, the authors examine factors influencing the spread of fake news, and suggest ways to combat it by exploring the key elements which enable and facilitate this phenomenon.
Fighting Fake News: Tools and Strategies for Teaching Media Literacy
This 6-page guide offers educators resources and strategies to define, detect and combat "fake news," including links to fact-checking sites and lesson plans.
How can the news be wrong? How do we know if what we're reading is true or not? This book helps answer these questions and provides kids with the necessary knowledge to make up their own minds on fake news and the media as a whole.
"An analysis of truth claims in contemporary U.S. political rhetoric through a series of case studies--including the PolitiFact fact-checking project, the Planned Parenthood "selling baby parts" scandal, the Chelsea Manning and Edward ...