English summary: This interpretation of the Philebus illustrates the conceptual framework which defined Plato's understanding of dialectic. The discussions in the Philebus which are of a general nature show that Plato was concerned with the idea that the structure of thinking could hardly be conceived of as a way to obtain true knowledge of all things, which is a requirement of philosophy. Nevertheless, Plato believed in philosophy in the sense that in his view philosophy was able to produce a real dialectical representation of everything. He argues that within this representation there is a kind of reason which unifies our knowledge and which can also unite the entire universe as well as our reasoning and actions. However since Plato assumes a reason which he sees as a cause and a teleological determination at the same time, it is clear that his conception has become the victim of difficulties that dialectic is actually supposed to resolve. German description: Dialektik bei Platon wurde bisher nur in defizitarer Weise verstanden. Dies liegt, wie Petra Schmidt-Wiborg zeigt, an einem Spannungsverhaltnis: Auf der einen Seite steht der universale Anspruch, alles in seiner Einheit dialektisch bestimmen zu konnen, auf der anderen Seite ist das Denken strukturellen Bedingungen unterworfen, unter denen Einheit schwerlich einzuholen ist. Dies wird verkurzt, wenn heute Dialektik teils als prinzipientheoretische und axiologische Begrundung, teils als Anwendungswissen gedeutet wird.Textnah zeigt die Autorin, wie im Philebos das dialektische Wissen ausdrucklich in Rucksicht auf seine problematischen Bedingungen konzipiert wird. Dialektik setzt Vernunft als Ursache und zugleich als teleologisches Wissen des Guten voraus. Vernunft soll im Handeln und in der Welt insgesamt fur Einheit sorgen und am Werke sein in der dialektischen Darstellung der Bestimmung des Seienden. Auch Parmenides und Sophistes pragt dasselbe Spannungsverhaltnis zwischen Anspruch und Bedingungen der Dialektik, welches der Philebos zu losen verspricht, das er aber - so das Ergebnis dieser systematischen Rekonstruktion der Dialektik - im doppeldeutigen Vernunftbegriff im Grunde bestatigt.
This edition also includes parallel passages from other Platonic dialogues and related material from Aristotle, the Stoics, and Epicurus.
This work, published in 1931 and reprinted in 1967 and 1982, is still important today, both as one of the most extensive and imaginative interpretations of Plato's Philebus and as an introduction to Gadamer's thinking, showing how his ...
This reference work, a useful resource for teaching and studying, is valuable reading for researchers, scholars, graduatestudents, and advanced undergraduates interested in Plato, ancient Greek ethics, and in the history of ethics.
This reference work, a useful resource for teaching and studying, is valuable reading for researchers, scholars, graduate students, and advanced undergraduates interested in Plato, ancient Greek ethics, and in the history of ethics.
Reproduction of the original. The publishing house Megali specialises in reproducing historical works in large print to make reading easier for people with impaired vision.
Among the last of the late Socratic dialogues, the central concern of the Philebus is the relative value of knowledge and pleasure. The text moves towards an understanding of human happiness and the constituent factors in 'the Good Life'.
Philebus belongs to the third dialogue group of Plato known as Sophistes.
The Philebus appears to be one of the later writings of Plato, in which the style has begun to alter, and the dramatic and poetical element has become subordinate to the speculative and philosophical.
In this book, he shows how this correspondence can be extended to key, but previously obscure, passages in the Statesman.
Diese Arbeit verfolgt das Ziel, die späte platonische Ethik aus dem Philebos zu rekonstruieren, indem eine besondere Beziehung von theoretischen und praktischen Fragen entwickelt wird.