Ist das Habermas'sche Werk eine Ethik der Moderne? Mit seiner Darstellung der Habermas'schen Philosophie will Detlef Horster diese Frage beantworten. Die Analyse reicht von der ersten Auseinandersetzung mit Heidegger über "Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln" bis zu der nationalen Einheit 1990. Dabei betont der Autor besonders die enge Verbindung von Theorie und gesellschaftlicher Praxis.
This volume provides an accessible and comprehensive conceptual map of Habermas' theoretical framework and its key concepts, including the theory of communicative action, discourse ethics, his social-political philosophy and their ...
A comprehensive and detailed analysis and sustained critique of Habermas' philosophical system since his pragmatist turn in the 70s.
Habermas is a hugely influential thinker, yet his writing can be dense and inaccessible. This critical introduction offers undergraduates a clear way into Habermas’s concept of the ‘public sphere’ and...
This is Jürgen Habermas's most concrete historical-sociological book and one of the key contributions to political thought in the postwar period.
First Published in 2004. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
This paperback edition contains a new greatly expanded bibliography of Habermas's work.
De Zan J., Nuevos desarrollos del programa de la etica comunicativa, in «Cuadernos de Etica», 5, 1988, pp. 81-90. DeHaven-Smit L., Philosophical Critique of Policy Analisys. Lindblom, Habermas, and the Great Society, Gainesville, FLA, ...
This new, expanded edition of Autonomy and Solidarity includes an additional five interviews in which Habermas discusses such themes as the history and significance of the Frankfurt School, the social and political development of post-war ...
Contributors: Jeffrey Alexander. Johann P. Arnason. Johannes Berger. Gunter Dux. Jurgen Habermas. Hans Joas. Hans-Peter Kruger. Thomas McCarthy. Herbert Schnadelbach. Martin Seel. Charles Taylor.
Holub demonstrates how Habermas pursues a course that incorporates various aspects of his opponents' positions, while simultaneously defending perceived threats to democracy and open discussion.