The Popper-Carnap Controversy

The Popper-Carnap Controversy
ISBN-10
9024751276
ISBN-13
9789024751273
Category
Philosophy (General)
Pages
124
Language
English
Published
1971-07-31
Publisher
Springer
Author
Alex C. Michalos

Description

1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.

Other editions

Similar books

  • Induction, Probability, and Skepticism: A History of Rival Ethics and Economics
    By Debi Prasad Chattopadhyaya

    The Popper - Carnap Controversy as a New Case Study of the Ongoing Theory - Practice Dialectic The Popper - Carnap controversy is not a new book , neither methodologically nor substantively . It is a new chapter of an old book authored ...

  • The Cambridge Companion to Carnap
    By Michael Friedman, Richard Creath

    In brief,ifthepredictiveprobabilities depend on Tn ,then in general they arise from mixtures of Johnson–Carnap ... VII.4 The Popper–Carnap controversy Karl Popper was a lifelong and dogged opponent of Carnap's induc- tivist views.

  • Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives
    By Jaakko Hintikka

    Alex C. Michalos, The Popper-Carnap Controversy, Martinus Nijhoff. The Hague, 1971. Ernest Nagel, “Carnap's Theory of Induction', in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (ed. by P. A. Schilpp), Open Court Publ. Co, LaSalle, I11., 1963, pp.

  • Imre Lakatos and Theories of Scientific Change
    By K. Gavroglu, P. Nicolacopoulos, Yorgos Goudaroulis

    In popular terms, the two fronts may be called the Popper–Carnap controversy and the Popper—Kuhn controversy.” In the first case, Popper's “falsificationism” stood up against Carnap's “inductivism”: while “weak justificationism” wanted ...

  • The Cambridge Companion to Popper
    By Jeremy Shearmur, Geoffrey Stokes

    The Popper–Carnap Controversy. The Hague: Mouton. Miller, D. W. 1985. 'La probabilitat des de la Logik der Forschung fins al present'. Enrahonar (Barcelona) 11 (1), 13–23. English version contained in chapter 9 of Miller 1994. 1994.

  • Logic, Probability, and Epistemology: The Power of Semantics
    By Sahotra Sarkar

    This is especially clear in the case of Carnap's discovery of ŋ and Hintikka's discovery of η inductive methods for ... 11 The confusions involved in the ' Popper - Carnap - controversy ' are discussed in detail in Michalos [ 30 ] ...

  • An Introduction to the Thought of Karl Popper
    By Roberta Corvi

    Gomez Tutor, J.J., 'Die Interpretation des kantischen Apriorismus in Poppers Frühwerk', Studi Kantiani 2 (1989), pp. 97–116. ... Michalos, A., The Popper-Carnap Controversy, Nijhoff, The Hague, 1971. Munz, P., 'Popper and Wittgenstein', ...

  • The Structure of Scientific Inference
    By Mary Hesse

    Most of these claims , principally those of Popper and L. J. Cohen , rest on two questionable assumptions : first ... I. Lakatos ( Amsterdam , 1968 ) , 315 ; and A. C. Michalos , The Popper - Carnap Controversy ( The Hague , 1971 ) .

  • Central Works of Philosophy: The twentieth century
    By John Shand

    Central Works of Philosophy Edited by John Shand Volume 1 : Ancient and Medieval Volume 2 : The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries Volume 3 : The Nineteenth Century Volume 4 : The Twentieth Century : Moore to Popper Volume 5 : The ...

  • Popper-Arg Philosophers
    By Anthony O'Hear

    Ayala, F.andDobzhansky, T. (eds) (1974), Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, Macmillan, London. Ayer,A. (1954),'Can TherebeaPrivate Language?', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary vol.28, pp.63–76. Ayer, A.(1956) ...