The main objective of the contributions to this book is to bring together two seemingly different strands of thought: the competition-law analysis of the exercise of intellectual property, and the discussion about the proper limits of protection, which at present takes place inside the intellectual property community. Both are burdened with their own problems, particularly so in Europe, where market integration and the divide between exclusionary and exploitative abuses ask for a more dimensional approach, and where the shaping of intellectual property protection is under not only the influence of many interests and policies, but a multi-level exercise of the Community and its member states. The question is whether, nevertheless, there is a common concern, or whether the frequently asserted convergence of the operation and of the goals of competition law and intellectual property law does not mask a fundamental difference - namely that of, on the one hand, protecting freedom of competition against welfare-reducing restrictions of competition only, and, on the other, limiting the protection of exclusive rights in the (public) interest of maintaining free access to general knowledge. The purpose of the workshop held in 2007 at the College of Europe, Bruges, and whose results are published here, was to ask which role market power plays in either context, which role it may legitimately play, and which role it ought not to play. A tentative answer might be found in the general principle that, just as intellectual property does not enjoy a particular status under competition law, so competition law may not come as a white knight to rescue intellectual property protection from itself. However, the meaning of that principle differs according to both the context of the acquisition and the exploitation of intellectual property, and it differs from one area of intellectual property to the other. Therefore, an attempt has also been made to cover more facets of the prism-like complex of problems than is generally done.
书名原文:Competition law
M.1315 Toyota Motor / Toyota Denmark M.1007 Toyota Motor / Toyota Franco M.1085 Toyota / Walter Frey M.158 Tractebel / Distrigaz M.237 Tractebel / Synatom M.223 Trans Atlantic 393a Transocean Marine Paint Assoc .
Levin , Richard C. , Wesley M. Cohen , and David C. Mowery ( 1985 ) . R & D appropriability , opportunity , and market structure : New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses . American Economic Review , 75 ( 2 ) : 20-24 ...
This is the fully revised 6th edition of EC Antitrust Procedure: a detailed analysis of how the European Commission investigates infringements in EC competition law, with guidance on all aspects of practice and procedure, referenced to the ...
An authority can be considered to be well placed to deal with a case is the following three cumulative conditions are met ... The Commission is particularly well placed if one or several agreement ( s ) or practice ( s ) , including ...
In COMP/M.4919 StatoilHydro/ConocoPhillips the merged group agreed to supply the divested business with petrol and diesel for five years (increased from three years following comments received in the market test), at [232] and [244].
Earle , 1 3 Pet. 5 1 9 ( 1 839 ) , began to weaken in the late nineteenth century but did not fully meet its demise until the twentieth century, as the U.S. Supreme Court increased protection for interstate commerce.
EEC Anti-trust Law: Principles and Practice
See, e.g., Shapiro, supra note 5, at 23-30; Daniel P. O'Brien & Abraham L. Wickelgren, A Critical Analysis of Critical Loss Analysis, 71 ANTITRUST L.J. 161-184 (2003); Michael Katz & Carl Shapiro, Critical Loss: Let's Tell the Whole ...
The Globalization of Antitrust: How Can Private Parties Navigate the World