This book is a comprehensive analysis of the definitions, concepts, and recent research on malingering, feigning, and other response biases in psychological injury/ forensic disability populations. It presents a new model of malingering and related biases, and develops a “diagnostic” system based on it that is applicable to PTSD, chronic pain, and TBI. Included are suggestions for effective practice and future research based on the literature reviews and the new systems, which are useful also because they can be used readily by psychiatrists as much as psychologists. In Malingering, Feigning, and Response Style Assessment in Psychiatric/Psychological Injury, Dr. Young ambitiously sets out to articulate and synthesize the polarities involved in the assessment of response styles in psychological disabilities, including PTSD, pain, and TBI. He does so thoroughly and very even-handedly, neither minimizing the degree that outright faking can be found in substantial numbers of examinees, nor disregarding the possibility that there can be causes for validity test failure other than malingering. He reviews the prior systems for classifying evidence of malingering, and proposes his own criteria for feigned PTSD. These are conservative and well-grounded in the prior literature. Finally, the book contains dozens of very recent references, giving testament to Dr. Young's immersion in the personal injury literature, as might be expected from his experience as founder and Editor in Chief for Psychological Injury and the Law. Reviewer: Steve Rubenzer, Ph.D., ABPP Board Certified Forensic Psychologist
"Widely used by practitioners, researchers, and students--and now thoroughly revised with 70% new material--this is the most authoritative, comprehensive book on malingering and related response styles.
Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/ 1385-4046(199911) 13:04;1-Y;FT545 Smith, D., & Resnick, P. (2007). Amnesia and competence to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law ...
Friedman, M. J., & Resick, P. A. (2014). DSM-5 criteria for PTSD. In M. J. Friedman, T. M. Keane, & P. A. Resick (Eds.), Handbook of PTSD: Science and practice (2nd ed., pp. 21–37). New York: Guilford Press. Friedman, M. J., Resick ...
Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology.
... of comparing recall to recognition memory , has been demonstrated to be especially effective at identifying malingered cognitive impairment ( Frederick , 2000 ; Greiffenstein et al . , 1994 , 1996 ; Haines & Norris , 2001 ) .
Professional neuropsychologists and forensic psychologists will appreciate this new edition of Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation as an invaluable source of refinements to their craft, and improvement as an expert ...
This volume offers a wide range of instructive real-world case examples involving the complex differential diagnosis where symptom exaggeration and/or malingering cloud the picture.
Evaluating competencies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. Grisso, T. (2005). Evaluating juveniles' adjudicative competence: A guide for clinical practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource ...
Kuester, A., Köhler, K., Ehring, T., Knaevelsrud, C., Kober, L., Krüger-Gottschalk, A., Schafer, I. Schelling, J., Wesemann, U., & Rau, H. (2017). Comparison of DSM-5 and proposed ICD-11 criteria for PTSD with DSM-IV and ICD-10: Changes ...
Residency admits persons with the medical doctor's professional qualification and having a higher education diploma and a certificate of internship issued in the Republic of Lithuania or abroad and recognized in Lithuania in accordance ...