Moral relativism is a philosophy that denies moral absolutes. In fact, the issue of moral relativism is very important, for no society of human history has ever existed without rejecting this philosophy. History knows not one example of a successful society that repudiated moral absolutes. Yet most attacks on relativism have been either pragmatic (looking at its social consequences) or exhorting (preaching rather than proving), and philosophers' arguments against it have been specialized, technical, and scholarly. In his typical unique writing style, the author lets an attractive, honest, and funny relativist interview a "Muslim fundamentalist" absolutist so as not to stack the dice personally for absolutism. In an engaging series of personal interviews, every conceivable argument the "sassy Black feminist" reporter Libby gives against absolutism is simply and clearly refuted, and none of the many arguments for moral absolutism is refuted.
In this book, Robert Baker argues that these inversions are the product of moral revolutions that follow a pattern similar to that of the scientific revolutions analyzed by Thomas Kuhn in his influential book, The Structure of Scientific ...
... F., 131 Gillon, R., 59 Green, R.M., 43 Grootendorst, R., 9; 99; 105 Haack, S., 165; 191 Hage, J.C., 105 Hart, A.C.'t, 148; 149; 151; 161; 169; 174 Hart, H.L.A., 32 Hart, O. van der, 153; 156; 157; 160; 171 Hartmann, N., ...
We are finally beginning to see that casuistry, once so despised, points a way out of the great dilemmas in moral reasoning we face today. To read this superb book...
Shades of Goodness argues that most moral theories have a gradable structure and, more significantly, that this is an advantage, rather than a disadvantage, for those theories.
In this collection of original essays on metaethics, the nature of morality, and the structure of moral reasoning are characterized, the limits of justification in ethics are examined, and the...
Whether O'Donovan's implication follows depends once more on the moral epistemology one brings to ethical theory. Here I can only stress again the 'bottom-up' nature of much moral reasoning according to the aretaic conception favoured ...
Presenting a new picture of the relationship between empirical moral psychology and moral philosophy, this book is essential reading for moral philosophers and moral psychologists alike.
The volume includes a series of 12 superb background papers on public moral discourse, mechanisms for handling social and ethical dilemmas, and other specific areas of controversy by well-known experts Ronald Bayer, Martin Benjamin, Dan W. ...
Together, the essays provide an accessible introduction to the major topics in contemporary moral theory.
Included in Sellars and Hospers , 1952 . 1950. Moral Obligation . New York . QUINE , W. van 0 . 1940. Mathematical Logic . New York . RADCLIFFE - BROWN , A. R. 1934. Social Sanctions . Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences , vol . xiii ...