Potts MB, Cameron S. Cell lineage and cell death: Caenorhabditis elegans and cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:50–58. Rudrapatna VA, Cagan RL, Das TK. Drosophila cancer models. Dev Dyn. 2012;241:107–118.
2004;170:1417– 1419. Partridge AH, Wong JS, Knudsen K, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet. 2005;365:963– 964. DelanyMoretlwe S, Stadler J, Mayaud P, Rees H. Investing in ...
Penney KL, Sinnott JA, Fall K, et al. mRNA expression signature of Gleason grade predicts lethal prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2391–2396. Baca SC, Prandi D, Lawrence MS, et al. Punctuated evolution of prostate cancer genomes.
Ernst T, Chase AJ, Score J, et al. Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders. Nat Genet. 2010;42:722–726. Sievers EL, Loken MR. Detection of minimal residual disease in acute myelogenous ...
Through this book, students, researchers and oncologists will obtain a comprehensive picture of what the first ten years of cancer genomics have revealed.
Tools such as sidebars, key concept summaries, a glossary, and acronym and abbreviation definitions make this book highly accessible to researchers from several fields associated with cancer genomics.
These improvements have transformed the field of cancer genomics, allowing the complete molecular characterization of individual cancer genomes.
This chapter represents a brief historical summary of some of the key success stories in our understanding of cancer that has led to our current age of cancer genomics.
In the light of a rapidly evolving field of breast cancer genomics, this chapter highlights key standard and upcoming approaches for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment and discusses the feasibility of genome-oriented personalized treatments ...
The vast amount of genomic data being produced by the research community is becoming readily accessible to biomedical researchers and clinicians to apply to their cancer(s) of interest.
We describe past, current and upcoming sequencing technologies and the application of second-generation sequencing technologies in cancer genomics.
The number of people diagnosed with cancer each year will almost double to 21 million cases worldwide by 2030 because of the aging population.
The complexity of the transcriptome has been appreciated in recent years in light of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project.
The classification of brain tumors has evolved from a morphological and histological basis to one that is now in keeping with the advances of modern technology consisting of novel molecular subgroups rooted in clinical outcome and risk ...
Recent technological advances in genomics have opened the door to potentially identifying genetic differences between individual children that may explain their different responses to cancer therapies.
The discovery of microRNA (miRNA) involvement in cancer a decade ago, and the more recent findings of long non-coding RNAs in human diseases, challenged the long-standing view that RNAs without protein-coding potential are simply “junk” ...
This work states that we are no longer satisfied to study a gene or gene product in isolation, but rather we strive to view each gene within the complex circuitry of a cell.
Neuroblastoma is one of the most common childhood tumors and has a remarkably diverse pattern of presentation and clinical behavior.
As well, such data have revealed novel sequences such as those from pathogens, mutations resulting in amino acid differences and fusion transcripts resulting from translocations and other structural alterations, each of which can inform the ...
In this chapter, we review these key considerations required to design and conduct biomarker studies that will yield results that can confidently inform future clinical research and clinical practice.