the disaster would not have arisen but for the unsea-worthiness, and hence the shipowners are liable ̧ Lord Porter: ̧ No doubt those who are either defending themselves or putting forward a counter-claim based upon an allegation of ...
270), and Mr. Justice Clarke himself accepted the possibility of such exceptions (at p. 272), although they were unspecified. Mr. Berry's submission on behalf of the ship (at p. 270) cited Barclays Bank Ltd. v Commissioners of Customs ...
Gorell Barnes J says: I think it is desirable also to express the view which I hold about the question turning on the construction of the words 'management of the ship', I am not satisfied that they go much,if at all,beyond the word ...
... 1 QB 742 ..............................................................................................................282 Smith, Hogg & Co v Black Sea and Baltic General Insurance Co Ltd, The Lilburn [1940] AC 997; [1939] 2 All ER ...
Note In Northumbrian Shipping v Timm [1939] AC 397, Lord Porter said that the right to determine bunkering stages was ... This approach to margins seems to coincide with the requirements of marine underwriters: see Kendall, L and ...
Significant innovations for this edition include: coverage of blockchain technology and smart contracts in shipping coverage of autonomous shipping recent developments on the construction of commercial shipping contracts recent developments ...
Together with commentary, this work offers an up-to-date collection of cases and materials dealing with the English laws of the carriage of goods by sea. It begins by examining the...
This book provides an up-to-date collection of materials relating to the carriage of goods by sea which will be of value to both students of law and legal practitioners.