Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress During 2004 and 2005
By Donna FarleyThe Dean's Executive Committee (DEC) and, ultimately, the dean, are the entities within COPH responsible for quality management. The DEC advises the dean on all matters that it considers significantly related to the efficient and ...
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress During 2006 and 2007
By Dana J. SchultzAnother relevant development related to sustainability is that Dr. Bryant-Williams and another staff member recently attended two grant-writing seminars to develop AMHC's capacity for garnering funds. In the past, MHI has had challenges ...
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress Through 2011
By Hao Yu, Susan L. Lovejoy, John EngbergThis external evaluation of Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Commission activities looks at program implementation and changes in health outcomes associated with seven health-related programs funded by the Master Settlement Agreement over the ...
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress During 2008 and 2009
By Dana J. SchultzArkansas' Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act invests the state's share of the tobacco Master Settlement Agreement funds in seven health-related programs.
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress Through 2011 - Summary
Tobacco takes a staggering toll on the health, well being, and finances of states.
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress from Program Inception to 2004
By Donna Farley, John Engberg, Matthew J. ChinmanDocuments the initiation and first two years of activity by the seven funded health-related programs set up under the Tobacco Settlement Proceeds Act, evaluates their progress, and makes recommendations for future program activities and ...
-
Evaluation of the Arkansas Tobacco Settlement Program: Progress Through 2011
This report is the fifth and final biennial report from RAND. It evaluates the progress of each of the funded programs, including assessing progress in achieving programmatic goals and tracking the programs' activities and indicators.