In Spiby,55 an automatic computer log of telephone calls made from a hotel bedroom was viewed as real evidence, as was a computer log of mobile phone calls in R v Robson, Mitchell and Richards.56 By contrast, in R v Wood,57 the ...
69 Davies and Noon, op. cit., n. 65, pp. 103–115. 70 Sanders et al., op. cit., n. 19, pp. 64–65. 71The Guardian, 17 January 2003. 72 Ellison, op. cit., ... s 27(4). 78 Ibid., s 27(5)(a). 79 Davies, G, Wilson, C, Mitchell, R, and Milsom, J,
[Mitchell, 51] E. Prior Inconsistent Statement 81. 82. 83. 84. Jesse testifies in plaintiff's case. On cross, no mention is made of the loan. Plaintiff rests. Assume that the loan application is properly authenticated and offered by ...
... 310, 312 R v W [2005] Crim LR 965 150 R v WandM [2010] EWCA Crim 1926 110 R v Wahab [2003] 1 CrApp R 15 208, 209 R v Wainwright (1875) 13 Cox CC 171 349 R v Wainwright [1998] Crim LR 665 298 R v Walker [1998] Crim LR 211 206, 207 R.
Evidence in Context is designed to create a fully contextual understanding of the law of evidence.
This edition includes a new chapter structure, with new chapters on the adversarial trial and suspect evidence.
This text builds upon current and emerging models of evidence and advocacy instruction, creating synergy between doctrine and skills.
"Evidence in Context is the perfect book for transforming an abstract knowledge of rules of evidence into a hands-on familiarity with how those rules work.
This fourth edition has been revised and expanded to include developments in the law of hearsay evidence as well as recent litigation surrounding witness anonymity orders, bad character and vulnerable witnesses.
A series of evidentiary problems and two case files designed tot each the fundamental evidentiary doctrine necessary to establish competency in evidentiary law.