Epstein and Knight, The Choices Justices Make, 13. Alex Kozinski, “What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making,” in O'Brien, ed., Judges on Judging: Views from the Bench, 71–76.
The Clifton family blames the resort for Reyna's fall, and sues for negligence. Daniel Mendoza and his firm are called in to defend the lawsuit, but when Mrs. Clifton is found dead in her hospital room, Daniel's suspicions arise.
Clifton. But who would have wanted to murder her, and is there some other foul play involved? This is the large print edition of May It Please The Court, with a larger font / typeface for easier reading.
Clifton. But who would have wanted to murder her, and is there some other foul play involved? This is the large print edition of May It Please The Court, with a larger font / typeface for easier reading.
Clifton. But who would have wanted to murder her, and is there some other foul play involved? NOTE: This is the trade paperback edition of May It Please The Court, with a 5" x 8" trim size.
Clifton. But who would have wanted to murder her, and is there some other foul play involved? NOTE: This is the clear print edition of May It Please The Court, with a 14pt font size for easier reading.
The Clifton family blames the resort for Reyna's fall, and sues for negligence. Daniel Mendoza and his firm are called in to defend the lawsuit, but when Mrs. Clifton is found dead in her hospital room, Daniel's suspicions arise.
Clifton. But who would have wanted to murder her, and is there some other foul play involved? This is the large print edition of May It Please The Court, with a larger font / typeface for easier reading.
With an updated epilogue, case studies, and discussion questions, this third edition is a robust resource for criminal justice students.
With an updated epilogue, case studies, and discussion questions, this third edition is a robust resource for criminal justice students."--Provided by publisher.
A book-and-audio set of Supreme Court oral arguments includes both transcriptions and recordings of twenty-three significant cases from the past half century, including Miranda v. Arizona, Roe v. Wade, and United States v. Nixon.
This book contains transcripts of twenty-three live recordings of landmark cases argued before the United States Supreme Court between 1955 and 1993.
The bestselling, unprecedented live recordings and transcripts of twenty-three landmark Supreme Court cases.
Deprived of his license to practice law in three states, the author examines professional conduct rules that are applied to judges, and offers prescriptive comments that should be binding upon any who seek a position on the bench.
Despite their clarity and sophistication, most judicial process texts currently available have two significant limitations. First, they understate the effects of legal factors such as stare decisis on judicial decision-making...
Judge Merhige has emerged as the most prominent example of a new breed of activist, problem-solving federal trial judges who aggressively impact upon American society and its institutions. May It...
The book includes background to each case, transcriptions of the arguments, and excerpts from the opinions and key dissents.