Chesterton's unique interpretive approach seems to be theimplicit fascination of all Chesterton scholarship to date, and yet this book is the first to comprehensively focus on the issue.
This book provides a comprehensive account of the intentionality of perceptual experience.
Whether political, poetic, polemic or personal, this is surprising, witty and intelligent writing to delight in.
Whether political, poetic, polemic or personal, this is surprising, witty and intelligent writing to delight in.
consciousness does not exist.” But what they say is consciousness is really something else. In Daniel Dennett's case, he says it is really just a computer program running in the brain. And in John Campbell's case, he says conscious ...
have been written by someone else who also happened to have also been called Homer, it would be of little consequence.1363 And even if “Moses was not Moses, but another person called Moses,” what would it really matter?1364 Chesterton ...