Smith & Wood's Employment Law
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Ian Smith, Aaron BakerIn Cheltenham BC v Laird [2009] the employer had unsuccessfully claimed almost £1m from the employee. 206 [1957] AC 555, [1957] 1AllER125,HL. 207 Glanville Williams 'Vicarious 166 contracts of employment (2): content and wages (iii) The ...
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Ian Smith, Aaron Baker338,348–9 Pearson v Kent County Council [1993] IRLR 165, CA... 115 Pearson v Skelton (1836) 1 M & W 504, Tyr & Gr848... 182 Pedersen v Camden London Borough Council [1981] IRLR 173, [1981] ICR 674n, CA... 508 Pename Ltd v Paterson ...
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Ian Smith, Aaron Baker, Owen WarnockIf the former, it is not to be included, but if the latter it may be brought into account according to the leading case of S & U Stores Ltd v Wilkes;441 such an arrangement may sometimes raise a suspicion of tax evasion, but the general ...
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Aaron Baker, Owen Warnock, I. T. SmithAuthoritative and accessible, 'Smith & Wood's Employment Law' provides detailed and well-explained coverage on the core areas and key case law.
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Aaron Baker, Owen Warnock, I. T. SmithAuthoritative and accessible, 'Smith & Wood's Employment Law' provides detailed and well-explained coverage on the core areas and key case law.
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Owen Warnock, I. T. Smith, Gemma MitchellAuthoritative and accessible, 'Smith & Wood's Employment Law' provides detailed and well-explained coverage on the core areas and key case law.
-
Smith & Wood's Employment Law
By Aaron Baker, Owen Warnock, I. T. SmithAuthoritative and accessible, 'Smith & Wood's Employment Law' provides detailed and well-explained coverage on the core areas and key case law.